Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya

被引:149
|
作者
Tittonell, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vanlauwe, B. [3 ]
Corbeels, M. [3 ,4 ]
Giller, K. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD Persyst, Unite Rech Syst Culture Annuels, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Wageningen Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Plant Prod Syst, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Int Ctr Trop Agr TSBF CIAT, Trop Soil Biol & Fertil Inst, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agron Dev, UMR Syst, F-34060 Montpellier 2, France
关键词
N use efficiency; P use efficiency; K use efficiency; QUEFTS model; Soil fertility gradients; Sub-Saharan Africa;
D O I
10.1007/s11104-008-9676-3
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The need to promote fertiliser use by African smallholder farmers to counteract the current decline in per capita food production is widely recognised. But soil heterogeneity results in variable responses of crops to fertilisers within single farms. We used existing databases on maize production under farmer (F-M) and researcher management (R-M) to analyse the effect of soil heterogeneity on the different components of nutrient use efficiency by maize growing on smallholder farms in western Kenya: nutrient availability, capture and conversion efficiencies and crop biomass partitioning. Subsequently, we used the simple model QUEFTS to calculate nutrient recovery efficiencies from the R-M plots and to calculate attainable yields with and without fertilisers based on measured soil properties across heterogeneous farms. The yield gap of maize between F-M and R-M varied from 0.5 to 3 t grain ha(-1) season(-1) across field types and localities. Poor fields under R-M yielded better than F-M, even without fertilisers. Such differences, of up to 1.1 t ha(-1) greater yields under R-M conditions are attributable to improved agronomic management and germplasm. The relative response of maize to N-P-K fertilisers tended to decrease with increasing soil quality (soil C and extractable P), from a maximum of 4.4-fold to -0.5fold relative to the control. Soil heterogeneity affected resource use efficiencies mainly through effects on the efficiency of resource capture. Apparent recovery efficiencies varied between 0 and 70% for N, 0 and 15% for P, and 0 to 52% for K. Resource conversion efficiencies were less variable across fields and localities, with average values of 97 kg DM kg(-1) N, 558 kg DM kg(-1) P and 111 kg DM kg(-1) K taken up. Using measured soil chemical properties QUEFTS over-estimated observed yields under F-M, indicating that variable crop performance within and across farms cannot be ascribed solely to soil nutrient availability. For the R-M plots QUEFTS predicted positive crop responses to application of 30 kg P ha(-1) and 30 kg P ha(-1) + 90 kg N ha(-1) for a wide range of soil qualities, indicating that there is room to improve current crop productivity through fertiliser use. To ensure their efficient use in sub-Saharan Africa mineral fertilisers should be: (1) targeted to specific niches of soil fertility within heterogeneous farms; and (2) go hand-in-hand with the implementation of agronomic measures to improve their capture and utilisation.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 37
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya
    P. Tittonell
    B. Vanlauwe
    M. Corbeels
    K. E. Giller
    [J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 313 : 19 - 37
  • [2] Maize productivity and nutrient and water use efficiencies across soil fertility domains on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe
    Kurwakumire, Natasha
    Chikowo, Regis
    Mtambanengwe, Florence
    Mapfumo, Paul
    Snapp, Sieglinde
    Johnston, Adrian
    Zingore, Shamie
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 164 : 136 - 147
  • [3] Understanding Global and Historical Nutrient Use Efficiencies for Closing Maize Yield Gaps
    Ciampitti, Ignacio A.
    Vyn, Tony J.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (06) : 2107 - 2117
  • [4] Narrowing yield gaps and increasing nutrient use efficiencies using the Nutrient Expert system for maize in Northeast China
    Xu, Xinpeng
    He, Ping
    Pampolino, Mirasol F.
    Li, Yuying
    Liu, Shuangquan
    Xie, Jiagui
    Hou, Yunpeng
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 194 : 75 - 82
  • [5] Strong spatial-temporal patterns in maize yield response to nutrient additions in African smallholder farms
    Njoroge, Samuel
    Schut, Antonius G. T.
    Giller, Ken E.
    Zingore, Shamie
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 214 : 321 - 330
  • [6] Integrated maize management options to improve forage yield and quality on smallholder farms in Kenya
    Lukuyu, B. A.
    Murdoch, A. J.
    Romney, D.
    Mwangi, D. M.
    Njuguna, J. G. M.
    McLeod, A.
    Jama, A. N.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2013, 153 : 70 - 78
  • [7] Maize grain yield responses to realistic biochar application rates on smallholder farms in Kenya
    Katterer, Thomas
    Roobroeck, Dries
    Kimutai, Geoffrey
    Karltun, Erik
    Nyberg, Gert
    Sundberg, Cecilia
    de Nowina, Kristina Roing
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 42 (04)
  • [8] Maize grain yield responses to realistic biochar application rates on smallholder farms in Kenya
    Thomas Kätterer
    Dries Roobroeck
    Geoffrey Kimutai
    Erik Karltun
    Gert Nyberg
    Cecilia Sundberg
    Kristina Röing de Nowina
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2022, 42
  • [9] Nutrient replenishment in smallholder farms of Western Kenya using the "PREP-PAC" product
    Okalebo, JR
    Karanja, NK
    Maritim, HK
    Woomer, PL
    Obura, PA
    Nekesa, P
    Mwaura, F
    [J]. DIRECT APPLICATION OF PHOSPHATE ROCK AND RELATED APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY-LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 367 - 377
  • [10] Maize yield response, nitrogen use efficiency and financial returns to fertilizer on smallholder farms in southern Africa
    Jama, Bashir
    Kimani, David
    Harawa, Rebbie
    Mavuthu, Abednego Kiwia
    Sileshi, Gudeta W.
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2017, 9 (03) : 577 - 593