Assessing biodiversity on the farm scale as basis for ecosystem service payments

被引:23
|
作者
von Haaren, Christina [1 ]
Kempa, Daniela [1 ]
Vogel, Katrin [2 ]
Rueter, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Environm Planning Dept, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Saarland, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Farm software; Farm assessment methods; Nature conservation advice; Sustainable agriculture; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS; CONSEQUENCES; HEDGEROWS; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services payments must be based on a standardised transparent assessment of the goods and services provided. This is especially relevant in the context of EU agri-environmental programs, but also for organic-food companies that foster environmental services on their contractor farms. Addressing the farm scale is important because land users/owners are major recipients of payments and they could be more involved in data generation and conservation management. A standardised system for measuring on-farm biodiversity does not yet exist that concentrates on performance indicators and includes farmers in generating information. A method is required that produces ordinal or metric scaled assessment results as well as management measures. Another requirement is the ease of application, which includes the ease of gathering input data and understandability. In order to respond to this need, we developed a method which is designed for automated application in an open source farm assessment system named MANUELA. The method produces an ordinal scale assessment of biodiversity that includes biotopes, species, biotope connectivity and the influence of land use. In addition, specific measures for biotope types are proposed. The open source geographical information system OpenJump is used for the implementation of MANUELA. The results of the trial applications and robustness tests show that the assessment can be implemented, for the most part, using existing information as well as data available from farmers or advisors. The results are more sensitive for showing on-farm achievements and changes than existing biotope-type classifications. Such a differentiated classification is needed as a basis for ecosystem service payments and for designing effective measures. The robustness of the results with respect to biotope connectivity is comparable to that of complex models, but it should be further improved. Interviews with the test farmers substantiate that the assessment methods can be implemented on farms and they are understood by farmers. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 50
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the effects of payments for ecosystem services programs on forest structure and species biodiversity
    Hsiang Ling Chen
    Rebecca L. Lewison
    Li An
    Yu Hsin Tsai
    Douglas Stow
    Lei Shi
    Shuang Yang
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2020, 29 : 2123 - 2140
  • [2] Assessing the effects of payments for ecosystem services programs on forest structure and species biodiversity
    Chen, Hsiang Ling
    Lewison, Rebecca L.
    An, Li
    Tsai, Yu Hsin
    Stow, Douglas
    Shi, Lei
    Yang, Shuang
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 29 (07) : 2123 - 2140
  • [3] A farm-scale biodiversity and ecosystem services assessment tool: the healthy farm index
    Quinn, John E.
    Brandle, James R.
    Johnson, Ron J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 11 (02) : 176 - 192
  • [5] Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation
    Hein, Lars
    Miller, Daniel C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [6] Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity
    Larjavaara, Markku
    Davenport, Tim R. B.
    Gangga, Adi
    Holm, Saara
    Kanninen, Markku
    Nguyen Dinh Tien
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [7] Could Payments for Ecosystem Services Create an "Ecosystem Service Curse"?
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    Hubacek, Klaus
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [8] Assessing and managing risks to ecosystem biodiversity
    Keith, David A.
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 40 (04) : 337 - 346
  • [9] Ecosystem service for farm: a methodological evaluation proposal of the pollination ecosystem service
    Sgroi, F.
    Pilati, L.
    Columba, P.
    Fontana, P.
    [J]. GREEN METAMORPHOSES: AGRICULTURE, FOOD, ECOLOGY, 2020, : 319 - 326
  • [10] Global Biodiversity Finance: The Case for International Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Hamman, Evan
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2016, 19 (01) : 153 - 154