Utility of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance

被引:57
|
作者
Whitney, Kriscinda A. [1 ,2 ]
Davis, Jeremy J. [3 ]
Shepard, Polly H. [2 ,4 ]
Herman, Steven M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Univ Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46227 USA
[4] Profess Psychol Serv, Indianapolis, IN 46227 USA
关键词
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; Test validity; Neuropsychology; Malingering; Military veterans; Memory;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study represents a replication and extension of the original Response Bias Scale (RBS) validation study. In addition to examining the relationship between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), RBS, and several other well-researched Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) validity scales (i.e., F, Fb, Fp, and the Fake Bad Scale), the present study also included the recently developed Infrequency Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale and the Henry-Heilbronner Index (HHI) of the MMPI-2. Findings from this retrospective data analysis (N = 46) demonstrated the superiority of the RBS, and to a certain extent the HHI, over other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM failure within the outpatient Veterans Affairs population. Results of the current study confirm the clinical utility of the RBS and suggest that, particularly if the MMPI-2 is an existing part of the neuropsychological assessment, examination of RBS scores is an efficient means of detecting negative response bias. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 786
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条