Estimating a measure of intellectual capital value to test its determinants

被引:30
|
作者
Goebel, Viktoria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Intellectual capital management; Intangibles; Intellectual capital; Long-run value; FIRMS MARKET VALUE; TOBIN-Q; PERFORMANCE; VALUATION; INTANGIBLES; RATIO;
D O I
10.1108/JIC-12-2013-0118
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify a measure of intellectual capital (IC) value which offers new research opportunities for empirical investigations and to examine the determinants of IC value. Design/methodology/approach - In total, 4,488 firm years of German companies are investigated to compare three measures of IC value: market-to-book, Tobin's q, and long-run value-to-book (LRVTB). Findings - LRVTB is observed to be the IC value measure with the highest explanatory value. This measure provides an approach to empirically test previously untested hypotheses on IC value. The results on testing determinants of IC value indicate that IC value is positively related to leverage and motivational payments to employees and negatively associated with company size. In contrast, recognised intangible assets, research and development (R&D), company age and concentrated ownership show no significant effects. Research limitations/implications - The findings on IC value measures contribute to IC research as they offer a way to estimate IC value for testing IC-related hypotheses. The findings on IC determinants have implications for IC management as the relevant determinants can be considered for IC value creation. Originality/value - This paper responds to the challenge posed by previous IC research to develop more creative quantitative approaches to estimate IC value (Marr et al., 2003; Mouritsen, 2006) in order to test IC-related hypotheses by innovatively applying a measure from mergers and acquisitions research to IC.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 120
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL EFFICIENCY AND ITS DETERMINANTS
    Kweh, Qian Long
    Chan, Yee Chuann
    Ting, Irene Wei Kiong
    [J]. KAJIAN MALAYSIA, 2015, 33 : 105 - 124
  • [2] Is the Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC)™ an Adequate Method to Measure Intellectual Capital?
    Silvestri, Antonella
    Veltri, Stefania
    [J]. IFKAD - KCWS 2012: 7TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS, 5TH KNOWLEDGE CITIES WORLD SUMMIT: KNOWLEDGE, INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: INTEGRATING MICRO & MACRO PERSPECTIVES, 2012, : 570 - 592
  • [3] The value model of intellectual capital and its application
    Fu, YL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCES AND GLOBAL STRATEGIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 1941 - 1949
  • [4] Investigating criteria to measure the value of intellectual capital and determining the effective factors
    Mahfoozi, Gholamreza
    Khalasi, Maryam Hassas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2015, 2 (09): : 8 - 18
  • [5] A Framework to Measure Intellectual Capital
    Baldini, Maria Assunta
    Bronzetti, Giovanni
    Sicoli, Graziella
    [J]. COUNTRY EXPERIENCES IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2017, 5 : 527 - 537
  • [6] The determinants of green intellectual capital
    Chang, Ching-Hsun
    Chen, Yu-Shan
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (1-2) : 74 - 94
  • [8] Methods and challenges of intellectual capital measure
    Weidong, Dai
    Kai, Li
    [J]. International Conference on Management Innovation, Vols 1 and 2, 2007, : 244 - 247
  • [9] A model for the value of intellectual capital
    Moon, Yun Ji
    Kym, Hyo Gun
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 23 (03): : 253 - 269
  • [10] Intellectual capital and company value
    Berzkalne, Irina
    Zelgalve, Elvira
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION 2013, 2014, 110 : 887 - 896