Clinical outcomes from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

被引:28
|
作者
Seeff, Laura C. [1 ]
Royalty, Janet [1 ]
Helsel, William E. [2 ]
Kammerer, William G. [2 ]
Boehm, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Dwyer, Diane M. [3 ]
Howe, William R., Jr. [2 ]
Joseph, Djenaba [1 ]
Lane, Dorothy S. [4 ]
Laughlin, Melinda [5 ]
Leypoldt, Melissa [6 ]
Marroulis, Steven C. [2 ]
Mattingly, Cynthia A. [2 ]
Nadel, Marion R. [1 ]
Phillips-Angeles, Ellen [7 ]
Rockwell, Tanner J. [2 ]
Ryerson, A. Blythe [1 ]
Tangka, Florence K. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Informat Management Serv Inc, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Maryland Dept Hlth & Mental Hyg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Med Ctr, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[5] Missouri Dept Hlth & Senior Serv, Jefferson City, MO USA
[6] Nebraska Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Publ Hlth Seattle & King Cty, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy; fecal occult blood testing; cancer screening programs; colorectal cancer prevention; UNITED-STATES; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; COLONOSCOPY; STRATEGIES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; INTERVENTIONS; SURVEILLANCE; ENDOSCOPIES; POPULATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28163
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among US men and women. Screening rates have been slow to increase, and disparities in screening remain. METHODS To address the disparity in screening for this high burden but largely preventable disease, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designed and established a 4-year Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) in 2005 for low-income, under-insured or uninsured men and women aged 50 to 64 years in 5 participating US program sites. In this report, the authors describe the design of the CRCSDP and the overall clinical findings and screening test performance characteristics, including the positive fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) rate; the rates of polyp, adenoma, and cancer detection with FOBTs and colonoscopies; and the positive predicative value for polyps, adenomas, and cancers. RESULTS In total, 5233 individuals at average risk and increased risk were screened for colorectal cancer across all 5 sites, including 44% who underwent screening FOBT and 56% who underwent screening colonoscopy. Overall, 77% of all individuals screened were women. The FOBT positivity rate was 10%. Results from all screening or diagnostic colonoscopies indicated that 75% had negative results and required a repeat screening colonoscopy in 10 years, 16% had low-risk adenomas and required surveillance colonoscopy in 5 to 10 years, 8% had high-risk adenomas and required surveillance colonoscopy in 3 years, and 0.6% had invasive cancers. CONCLUSIONS This report documents the successes and challenges in implementing the CDC's CRCSDP and describes the clinical outcomes of this 4-year initiative, the patterns in program uptake and test choice, and the comparative test performance characteristics of FOBT versus colonoscopy. Patterns in final outcomes from the follow-up of positive screening tests were consistent with national registry data. Cancer 2013;119(15 suppl):2820-33. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention designed and established a 4-year Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) in 2005 for low-income, under-insured or uninsured men and women aged 50 to 64 years in 5 participating US program sites. This report documents the successful implementation of the CRCSDP and describes the clinical outcomes of this 4-year initiative, patterns in program uptake and test choice, challenges in implementation of fecal occult blood test screening programs, and comparative test performance characteristics of fecal occult blood testing versus colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:2820 / 2833
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lessons learned from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2817 - 2819
  • [2] Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Nadel, Marion R.
    Royalty, Janet
    Shapiro, Jean A.
    Joseph, Djenaba
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Lane, Dorothy S.
    Dwyer, Diane M.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2834 - 2841
  • [3] Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: Wisdom from the field
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    DeGroff, Amy
    Glover-Kudon, Rebecca
    Preissle, Judith
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2870 - 2883
  • [4] Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Hoover, Sonja
    Beebe, Maggie C.
    DeGroff, Amy
    Royalty, Janet
    Seeff, Laura C.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2855 - 2862
  • [5] Outpatient Colonoscopy Complications in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: A Prospective Analysis
    Azrak, M. Fuad
    Castro, Georgina
    Seeff, Laura
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S553 - S554
  • [6] Outpatient Colonoscopy Complications in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program A Prospective Analysis
    Castro, Georgina
    Azrak, M. Fuad
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Royalty, Janet
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2849 - 2854
  • [7] Recruiting Patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program Strategies and Challenges Across 5 Sites
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Preissle, Judith
    DeGroff, Amy
    Glover-Kudon, Rebecca
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2914 - 2925
  • [8] Developmental Milestones Across the Programmatic Life Cycle Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Glover-Kudon, Rebecca
    DeGroff, Amy
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Preissle, Judith
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2926 - 2939
  • [9] Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Cohtrol Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Hoover, Sonja
    Royalty, Janet
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Djenaba
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2017, 62 : 73 - 80
  • [10] VARIATION IN THE COST OF PROMOTING CANCER SCREENING: REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE FROM CDC'S COLORECTAL CANCER CONTROL PROGRAM IN THE USA
    Tangka, Florence
    Subramanian, Suhja
    Hoover, Sonja
    Cole-Beebe, Maggie
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Kristy
    Royalty, Janet
    Saraiya, Mona
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 240 - 241