Prospective comparative study between two first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Non-bismuth quadruple versus bismuth quadruple therapy

Background: The Maastricht V Consensus recommends quadruple therapies as first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment in high clarithromycin (CIA) resistance areas. Aims: To compare efficacy, side effects and compliance between quadruple concomitant non-bismuth vs bismuth quadruple therapy. Method: Prospective study enrolling H. pylori-positive patients. Omeprazol and a three-in- one formulation of bismuth-metronidazol-tetracycline (OBMT-3/1) for 10 days, or combination of omeprazol-clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazol (OCAM) for 14 days, were prescribed. Eradication outcome was assessed by urea breath test or histology. Side effects and compliance were recorded during the treatment period with specific questionnaires. Results: 404 patients were recruited (median age 53 years; 62.87% women). In 382 (183 with OCAM, 199 with OBMT-3/1) the post-treatment test result was available. The eradication rates were 85.94% (CI95%: 80.20-90.52) with OCAM and 88.21% (CI95%: 83.09-92.22) with OBMT-3/1 (p= 0.595) in intention-to-treat analysis, whilst in per protocol analysis they were 91.12% (CI95%: 85.78-94.95) and 96.17% (CI95%: 92.28-98.45) respectively (p= 0.083). Compliance over 90% was 91.35% with OCAM and 92.04% with OBMT-3/1 (p= 0.951). Some side effect was present in 94.02% with OCAM and in 88.89% with OBMT-3/1 (p = 0.109), being longer (12 vs 7 days, p <0.0001) and more severe (p <0.0001) with OCAM. Conclusions: In a high CLA-resistance area, there are no differences between OBMT-3/1 and OCAM in H. pylori eradication and compliance rates, but OBMT-3/1 achieves a higher safety profile. (C) 2020 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.