Utility of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry Expression Pattern as a Surrogate of BRAF Mutation Status in 154 Patients with Advanced Melanoma

被引:35
|
作者
Tetzlaff, Michael T. [1 ]
Pattanaprichakul, Penvadee [2 ]
Wargo, Jennifer [3 ]
Fox, Patricia S. [4 ]
Patel, Keyur P. [5 ]
Estrella, Jeannelyn S. [1 ]
Broaddus, Russell R. [1 ]
Williams, Michelle D. [1 ]
Davies, Michael A. [6 ]
Routbort, Mark J. [5 ]
Lazar, Alexander J. [1 ]
Woodman, Scott E. [6 ]
Hwu, Wen-Jen [6 ]
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. [3 ]
Prieto, Victor G. [1 ]
Torres-Cabala, Carlos A. [1 ]
Curry, Jonathan L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Dermatol, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hematopathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Melanoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BRAF V600E; Melanoma; Immunohistochemistry; Next-generation sequencing; Sensitivity; Specificity; BRAF(V600E) MUTATION; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; VALIDATION; METASTASES; SPECTRUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2015.04.012
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Successful BRAF inhibitor therapy depends on the accurate assessment of the mutation status of the BRAF V600 residue in tissue samples. In melanoma, immunohistochernical (IFIC) analysis with monoclonal anti BRAF V600E has emerged as a sensitive and specific surrogate of BRAF V600E mutation, particularly when BRAF V600E protein expression is homogeneous and strong. A subset of melanomas exhibit heterogeneous labeling for BRAF V600E, but our understanding of the significance of heterogeneous BRAF V600E IFIC expression is limited. We used next-generation sequencing to compare BRAF V600E IHC staining patterns in 154 melanomas: 79 BRAF(WT) and 75 BRA? (including 53 V600E) mutants. Agreement among dermatopathologists on tumor morphology, IHC expression, and :intensity was excellent (rho = 0.99). A predominantly epithelioid cell phenotype significantly correlated with the BRA? V600E mutation (P = .0085). Tumors demonstrating either heterogeneous or homogeneous IHC expression were significantly associated with the BRAF V600E mutation (P < .0001), as was increased intensity of staining (P < .0001). The positive predictive value was 98% for homogenous IHC expression compared with 70% for heterogeneous labeling. Inclusion of both heterogeneous and homogeneous BRAF V600E IHC expression as a positive test significantly improved IHC test sensitivity from 85% to 98%. However, this reduced BRAF V600E IHC test specificity from 99% to 96%. Cautious evaluation of heterogeneous BRAF V600E IHC expression is warranted and comparison with sequencing results is critical, given its reduced test specificity and positive predictive value for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1101 / 1110
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BRAF Mutation (V600E) Prevalence in Mexican Patients Diagnosed with Melanoma
    Denise Zepeda-Lopez, Priscilla
    Cesar Salas-Alanis, Julio
    Toussaint-Caire, Sonia
    Gutierrez-Mendoza, Daniela
    Vega-Memije, Elisa
    Lino Silva, Saul
    Raul Fajardo-Ramirez, Oscar
    Alcazar, Gregorio
    Guadalupe Moreno-Trevino, Mara
    Barrera Saldana, Hugo Alberto
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 9 (01): : 241 - 245
  • [22] Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody
    David Capper
    Matthias Preusser
    Antje Habel
    Felix Sahm
    Ulrike Ackermann
    Genevieve Schindler
    Stefan Pusch
    Gunhild Mechtersheimer
    Hanswalter Zentgraf
    Andreas von Deimling
    Acta Neuropathologica, 2011, 122 : 11 - 19
  • [23] Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody
    Capper, David
    Preusser, Matthias
    Habel, Antje
    Sahm, Felix
    Ackermann, Ulrike
    Schindler, Genevieve
    Pusch, Stefan
    Mechtersheimer, Gunhild
    Zentgraf, Hanswalter
    von Deimling, Andreas
    ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA, 2011, 122 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [24] Utility of BRAF VE1 Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for Colorectal Cancer Harboring BRAF V600E Mutation
    Kwon, Jeong-Hwa
    Jeong, Byung-Kwan
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jihun
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (03) : 157 - 163
  • [25] Amelanotic primary dermal melanoma with V600E BRAF mutation
    Kabuto, Miho
    Fujimoto, Noriki
    Teramura, Kazuya
    Nakanishi, Takeshi
    Fujimura, Taku
    Manabe, Toshiaki
    Tanaka, Toshihiro
    DERMATOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 35 (02) : 110 - 111
  • [26] BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Carcinoma
    Estrella, J. S.
    Tetzlaff, M. T.
    Kazen, C.
    Kopetz, S.
    Maru, D. M.
    Rashid, A.
    Hamilton, S. R.
    Broaddus, R. R.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 173A - 173A
  • [27] BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Carcinoma
    Estrella, J. S.
    Tetzlaff, M. T.
    Kazen, C.
    Kopetz, S.
    Maru, D. M.
    Rashid, A.
    Hamilton, S. R.
    Broaddus, R. R.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 173A - 173A
  • [28] Braf V600E mutation in melanoma: translational current scenario
    J. A. Guadarrama-Orozco
    A. Ortega-Gómez
    E. B. Ruiz-García
    H. Astudillo-de la Vega
    A. Meneses-García
    C. Lopez-Camarillo
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2016, 18 : 863 - 871
  • [29] Prospective immunohistochemical analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma
    Ristimaki, A.
    Thiel, A.
    Moza, M.
    Kytola, S.
    Orpana, A.
    Jahkola, T.
    Hernberg, M.
    Virolainen, S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2014, 465 : S318 - S318
  • [30] Analysis of the BRAF V600E mutation in primary cutaneous melanoma
    Inumaru, J. S. S.
    Gordo, K. I. F.
    Fraga Junior, A. C.
    Silva, A. M. T. C.
    Leal, C. B. Q. S.
    Ayres, F. M.
    Wastowski, I. J.
    Borges, N. F.
    Saddi, V. A.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2014, 13 (02) : 2840 - 2848