What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model

被引:11
|
作者
Xu, Yuxuan [1 ]
Liu, Hongbin [2 ]
Lyu, Jie [1 ]
Xue, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Land & Environm, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
soil testing and formulated fertilization technology; technology adoption behavior; logistic-ISM model; black soil ecosystem conservation; ACCEPTANCE; CONSERVATION; DIFFUSION; WHEAT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192315682
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Along with the increasing prominence of environmental risks such as soil surface source pollution and declining quality grade of arable land, the issues of how to address irrational fertilizer application and enhance the safety of agricultural products have attracted widespread attention. In this context, clarifying the main factors affecting farmers' use of soil testing and formulated fertilization technology (STFFT) can further improve the technology adoption rate and fertilizer utilization efficiency, promote standardized agricultural production and maintain the health and stability of soil ecology in black soil areas. This is of great significance to the construction of green agriculture, national dietary health and national food security. This study builds an "external environmental stimuli-perceived characteristics-adoption behavior" theoretical framework to investigate the decision-making and the dynamic influence mechanisms of farmers' adoption behavior of STFFT. Based on farmer survey data, the logistic-ISM model has been applied. The main findings are as follows. First, five types of influencing factors, namely individual characteristics, family characteristics, business characteristics, cognitive characteristics and external environmental characteristics, had significant "push" effects on farmers' STFFT adoption behavior. Among them, planting scale and technical training are the key factors influencing farmers' adoption of scientific fertilizer application technology. Second, both farmers' perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness play a significant role in farmers' decision-making process, and the easier farmers perceive STFFT to be to master and the greater the benefits it brings, the more pronounced the tendency to adopt the technology, all other influencing conditions being equal. Third, the main influencing factors of farmers' STFFT adoption behavior are intrinsically related and divided into four categories based on the magnitude of influence: deep-rooted, medium indirect, shallow indirect and superficial direct. In order to reduce further degradation of black soil caused by farmers' irrational production habits and to improve resource utilization efficiency, this study recommends the government to further regulate the land transfer market, strengthen the propagation of soil-conservation-type technologies in black soil areas, expand the breadth of agricultural technology training and enhance farmers' understanding and trust in STFFT. Thus, the maintenance of soil ecosystem in black soil areas, effective guarantee of food security and sustainable development of agriculture can be achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Study on the Influencing Factors of Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Tillage Technology in Black Soil Region in China: A Logistic-ISM Model Approach
    Guo, Hongpeng
    Zhao, Wenkai
    Pan, Chulin
    Qiu, Guijie
    Xu, Shuang
    Liu, Shun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (13)
  • [2] The Impact of Different Uses of the Internet on Farmers′ Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Rural China
    Zeng, Junxia
    Li, Dengwang
    Ma, Cuiping
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Liangliang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [3] Mutual proximity and heterogeneity in peer effects of farmers' technology adoption: evidence from China's soil testing and formulated fertilization program
    Xu, Zhigang
    Zhang, Kerong
    Zhou, Li
    Ying, Ruiyao
    [J]. CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 14 (02) : 395 - 415
  • [4] Understanding farmers' eco-friendly fertilization technology adoption behavior using an integrated S-O-R model: The case of soil testing and formulated fertilization technology in shaanxi, china
    Dong, Hao
    Wang, Bo
    Han, Jichang
    Luo, Lintao
    Wang, Huanyuan
    Sun, Zenghui
    Zhang, Lei
    Dai, Miao
    Cheng, Xiaohui
    Zhao, Yunliang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [5] The effect of noncognitive abilities on promoting the adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology by farmers: empirical insights from Central China
    Liu, Qiqi
    Yan, Tingwu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [6] Analysis of Factors Influencing the Adoption Behavior of Agricultural Productive Services Based on Logistic-ISM Model: A Case Study of Rice Farmers in Jiangxi Province, China
    Ai, Juan
    Hu, Lun
    Xia, Shuhua
    Xiang, Hongling
    Chen, Zhaojiu
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [7] Technical training and rice farmers' adoption of low-carbon management practices: The case of soil testing and formulated fertilization technologies in Hubei, China
    Liu, Yong
    Ruiz-Menjivar, Jorge
    Zhang, Lu
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Swisher, Marilyn E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 226 : 454 - 462
  • [8] Impact of Environmental Values and Information Awareness on the Adoption of Soil Testing and Formula Fertilization Technology by Farmers-A Case Study Considering Social Networks
    Tian, Mengling
    Liu, Ruifeng
    Wang, Jian
    Liang, Jiahao
    Nian, Yefan
    Ma, Hengyun
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [9] A Logit Model Based Study on the Influencing Factors on Farm Household's Adoption of Soil Testing and Formula Fertilizing Technology: A Case of Four Towns
    Yang, Lixia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION II, 2014, 675-677 : 985 - 988