POWER PLANT HEAT REJECTION SYSTEM MODELING AND COMPARISON

被引:0
|
作者
Carter, Thomas P. [1 ]
Furlong, James W. [1 ]
Bushart, Sean P. [2 ]
Shi, Jessica [2 ]
机构
[1] Johnson Controls Inc, Waynesboro, PA 17268 USA
[2] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As noted in a Summer 2007 EPRI Journal article entitled Running Dry At The Power Plant, "Securing sufficient supplies of fresh water for societal, industrial, and agricultural uses while protecting the natural environment is becoming increasingly difficult in many parts of the United States. Climate variability and change may exacerbate the situation through hotter weather and disrupted precipitation patterns that promote regional drought." [1] Currently, in the United States, thermoelectric power production accounts for approximately 41% of freshwater withdrawals [2] and 3% of overall fresh water consumption. [3] The Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI, as part of its Technology Innovation (TI) program, is collaborating with Johnson Controls to conduct a feasibility study comparing the performance of a water saving Thermosyphon Cooling Hybrid System (TCHS) with other heat rejection systems for power plant applications. The TCHS employs a sensible heat rejection device, a thermosyphon cooler (TSC) in conjunction with an evaporative heat rejection device, an open cooling tower, to satisfy the annual cooling requirements of a given power plant. By reducing the evaporative heat load, the TCHS can significantly reduce the annual water consumed for cooling while still maintaining peak power plant output on the hottest summer days. Details of the interactive simulation program developed to compare various power plant heat rejection systems on an annual 8,760 hourly basis are discussed. Examples of the types of results and comparisons that can be made from the data obtained from the simulation program are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THERMOSYPHON COOLER HYBRID SYSTEM FOR WATER SAVING POWER PLANT HEAT REJECTION
    Carter, Thomas P.
    Furlong, James W.
    Bushart, Sean P.
    Shi, Jessica
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE, 2013, VOL 2, 2014,
  • [2] NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT HEAT REJECTION IN AN ARID CLIMATE
    SCOFIELD, FC
    FAZZOLAR.RA
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1973, 20 (03) : 140 - 148
  • [3] MULTI-SCALE MODELING OF POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT USING ASYNCHRONOUS THERMAL STORAGE AND HEAT REJECTION
    Gagnon, Lauren B.
    Helmns, Dre
    Carey, Van P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 8B, 2019,
  • [4] REGIONAL CLIMATIC EFFECTS OF POWER-PLANT HEAT REJECTION - REPLY
    MOORE, FK
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1976, 10 (10) : 902 - 902
  • [5] Modeling and simulation of a novel combined heat and power system with absorption heat pump based on solar thermal power tower plant
    Li, Xing
    Wang, Zhifeng
    Yang, Ming
    Yuan, Guofeng
    ENERGY, 2019, 186
  • [6] A comparison of coolant options for Brayton Power Conversion heat rejection systems
    Siamidis, J
    Mason, L
    SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL FORUM - STAIF 2006, 2006, 813 : 682 - +
  • [7] Conceptual modeling of power plant simulation system
    Ma, P
    Yang, M
    Wang, ZC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INSTRUMENTATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 3, 2002, : 204 - 208
  • [8] Modeling and simulation of reactor core emergency remaining heat releasing system on nuclear power plant
    Chongqing Univ, Chongqing, China
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao, 4 (254-258):
  • [9] Modeling and simulation of reactor core emergency remaining heat releasing system on nuclear power plant
    Yang, Chen
    He, Zuwei
    Tang, Shengli
    Gou, Xiadong
    Xie, Tao
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 1997, 17 (04): : 254 - 258
  • [10] Concentrated Solar Power Plant Modeling for Power System Studies
    Yao, Lingxiang
    Wang, Yang
    Xiao, Xianyong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2024, 39 (02) : 4252 - 4263