Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality in Monochorionic and Dichorionic Twins: A Population-Based Study EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:1
|
作者
Glinianaia, Svetlana V. [1 ]
Obeysekera, Madhumi A.
Sturgiss, Stephen
Bell, Ruth
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e318242d09c
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
It is well established that twins have a higher risk of adverse birth outcomes compared with singletons; the stillbirth rate and neonatal mortality among twins are at least 4 times higher in twins. Chorionicity is an important predictor of perinatal mortality in twins. Most studies have reported higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in monochorionic (MC) twins compared with dichorionic (DC) twins. No large population-based studies have examined the prospective risk of stillbirth by gestational age for twin pregnancies, especially with stratification by chorionicity. The primary aim of this population-based study was to compare stillbirth and neonatal mortality in DC and MC twins by cause of death and over time. A secondary aim was to quantify the prospective risk of stillbirth in MC and DC twins by gestational age. Data on twin pregnancies delivered between 1998 and 2007 were obtained from the Northern Survey of Twin and Multiple Pregnancy, which registers all multiple pregnancies in the north of England. The prospective gestational age-specific risk of stillbirth was calculated using number of stillborn fetuses at or beyond a given gestational period per 1000 fetuses in continuing pregnancies. A total of 4565 twin maternities (9130 twins) were examined; the overall twinning rate was 14.9 per 1000 maternities. During the 10-year study period, the overall perinatal mortality rate was 40.0 per 1000 twins; this included stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates of 18.0 and 23.0 per 1000 live births, respectively. Compared with DC twins, the stillbirth rate in MC twins was 3.6 fold higher (44.4 vs. 12.2 per 1000 births) and the neonatal mortality rate was 1.5 fold higher (32.4 vs. 21.4 per 1000 live births); the relative risk was 3.6, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.6 to 5.1, and was 1.5, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.04 to 2.2, respectively. No significant improvement over time occurred in either group with regard to stillbirth or neonatal mortality rate. The prospective risk of antepartum stillbirth at all gestational ages in MC twins was significantly higher than DC twins; the highest risk was before 28 completed weeks of gestation. These findings demonstrate higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality for MC twins compared with DC twins, with no improvement in either group during the 10-year study period. The prospective risk of antepartum stillbirth is much higher in MC than DC twins at all gestational ages.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 17
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study
    Glinianaia, Svetlana V.
    Obeysekera, Madhumi A.
    Sturgiss, Stephen
    Bell, Ruth
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (09) : 2549 - 2557
  • [2] Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins
    Burgess, Jennifer L.
    Unal, Elizabeth R.
    Nietert, Paul J.
    Newman, Roger B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (06)
  • [3] Prospective risk of stillbirth: monochorionic diamniotic twins vs. dichorionic twins
    Morikawa, Mamoru
    Yamada, Takashi
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Sato, Shoji
    Cho, Kazutoshi
    Minakami, Hisanori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (03) : 245 - 249
  • [4] Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in a subsequent pregnancy following stillbirth: a population-based cohort study
    Nijkamp, Janna W.
    Ravelli, Anita C. J.
    Groen, Henk
    Erwich, Jan Jaap H. M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in a subsequent pregnancy following stillbirth: a population-based cohort study
    Janna W. Nijkamp
    Anita C. J. Ravelli
    Henk Groen
    Jan Jaap H. M. Erwich
    Ben Willem J. Mol
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [6] Neonatal outcomes between discordant monochorionic and dichorionic twins
    Park, Yong Hee
    Kim, Young Nam
    Im, Do Hwa
    Kim, Da Hyun
    Byun, Jung Mi
    Jeong, Dae Hoon
    Lee, Kyung Bok
    Sung, Moon Su
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (13): : 2080 - 2088
  • [7] Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications for monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic twins after 24 weeks of gestation
    Yu, Florrie Nga Yui
    Mak, Annisa Shui Lam
    Chan, Ngai Man
    Siu, Kiu Lok
    Ma, Teresa Wei Ling
    Leung, Kwok Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (09) : 3127 - 3135
  • [8] A population-based cohort study of stillbirth among twins in Lusaka, Zambia
    Stringer, Elizabeth M.
    Chibwesha, Carla
    Stoner, Marie
    Vwalika, Bellington
    Joseph, Jessica
    Chi, Benjamin H.
    Kaunda, Eugene
    Goodnight, William
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 130 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [9] Neonatal morbidity and mortality among growth-discordant dichorionic twins, classified according to birth weight of the smaller twin: a population-based cohort study
    Razem, Katja
    Bombac, Lea
    Tul, Natasa
    Blickstein, Isaac
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (15): : 2608 - 2611
  • [10] Delivery of Monochorionic Twins in the Absence of Complications: Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes and Costs EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Sullivan, Amy Elizabeth
    Hopkins, Paul Nathan
    Weng, Hsin-Yi
    Henry, Erick
    Lo, Jamie Oi-Ting
    Varner, Michael Walter
    Esplin, Michael Sean
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2012, 67 (07) : 402 - 403