Human exit route choice in virtual crowd evacuations

被引:126
|
作者
Bode, Nikolai W. F. [1 ]
Codling, Edward A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Math Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Univ Essex, Sch Biol Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
crowd behaviour; decision making; emergency evacuation; individual-based model; pedestrian interactions; virtual environment; DECISION-MAKING; BEHAVIOR; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.025
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The collective behaviour of human crowds emerges from the local interactions of individuals. To understand human crowds we therefore need to identify the behavioural rules individual pedestrians follow. This is crucial for the control of emergency evacuations from confined spaces, for example. At a microscopic level we seek to predict the next step of pedestrians based on their local environment. However, we also have to consider 'tactical-level' individual behaviour that is not an immediate response to the local environment, such as the choice between different routes to exit a building. We used an interactive virtual environment to study human exit route decisions in simulated evacuations. Participants had to escape from a building and had to choose between different exit routes in the presence of evacuating simulated agents. We found no inherent preference for familiar routes, but under a stress-inducing treatment, subjects were more likely to display behaviour in their route choice that was detrimental to their evacuation time. Most strikingly, subjects were less likely to avoid a congested exit by changing their original decision to move towards it under this treatment. Age and gender had clear effects on reaction times in the virtual environment. (C) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 358
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Information use by humans during dynamic route choice in virtual crowd evacuations
    Bode, Nikolai W. F.
    Wagoum, Armel U. Kemloh
    Codling, Edward A.
    [J]. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2015, 2 (01):
  • [2] Using virtual reality to study pedestrian exit choice behaviour during evacuations
    Feng, Yan
    Duives, Dorine C.
    Hoogendoorn, Serge P.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 137
  • [3] Human responses to multiple sources of directional information in virtual crowd evacuations
    Bode, Nikolai W. F.
    Wagoum, Armel U. Kemloh
    Codling, Edward A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2014, 11 (91)
  • [4] Simulating dynamics of adaptive exit-choice changing in crowd evacuations: Model implementation and behavioural interpretations
    Haghani, Milad
    Sarvi, Majid
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 103 : 56 - 82
  • [5] Order-disorder phase transitions in front of the exit during human crowd evacuations
    Yi, Wenfeng
    Wu, Wenhan
    Wang, Xiaolu
    Wang, Erhui
    Zheng, Xiaoping
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 163
  • [6] Modelling Context Effects in Exit Choice for Building Evacuations
    Gao, Dongli
    Liang, Xuanwen
    Chen, Qian
    Qiu, Hongpeng
    Lee, Eric Wai Ming
    [J]. FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2024, 7 (05):
  • [7] Modeling exit choice behavior in airplane emergency evacuations
    Xu, Chenchen
    Luo, Yiyang
    Fuellhart, Kurt
    Shao, Quan
    Witlox, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 112
  • [8] Exit Choice Decisions During Pedestrian Evacuations of Buildings
    Duives, Dorine C.
    Mahmassani, Hani S.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2316) : 84 - 94
  • [9] A discrete choice model based on random utilities for exit choice in emergency evacuations
    Lovreglio, Ruggiero
    Borri, Dino
    dell'Olio, Luigi
    Ibeas, Angel
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 62 : 418 - 426
  • [10] A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations
    Lovreglio, Ruggiero
    Fonzone, Achille
    dell'Olio, Luigi
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 92 : 59 - 75