Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics

被引:42
|
作者
Meslier, Victoria [1 ]
Quinquis, Benoit [1 ]
Da Silva, Kevin [1 ]
Plaza Onate, Florian [1 ]
Pons, Nicolas [1 ]
Roume, Hugo [1 ]
Podar, Mircea [2 ]
Almeida, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, INRAE, MetaGenoPolis, F-78350 Jouy En Josas, France
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Biosci Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DIVERSITY; ALGORITHM; BACTERIAL; ARCHAEAL;
D O I
10.1038/s41597-022-01762-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing is a common approach for studying the taxonomic diversity and metabolic potential of complex microbial communities. Current methods primarily use second generation short read sequencing, yet advances in third generation long read technologies provide opportunities to overcome some of the limitations of short read sequencing. Here, we compared seven platforms, encompassing second generation sequencers (Illumina HiSeq 300, MGI DNBSEQ-G400 and DNBSEQ-T7, ThermoFisher Ion GeneStudio S5 and Ion Proton P1) and third generation sequencers (Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION R9 and Pacific Biosciences Sequel II). We constructed three uneven synthetic microbial communities composed of up to 87 genomic microbial strains DNAs per mock, spanning 29 bacterial and archaeal phyla, and representing the most complex and diverse synthetic communities used for sequencing technology comparisons. Our results demonstrate that third generation sequencing have advantages over second generation platforms in analyzing complex microbial communities, but require careful sequencing library preparation for optimal quantitative metagenomic analysis. Our sequencing data also provides a valuable resource for testing and benchmarking bioinformatics software for metagenomics.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics
    Victoria Meslier
    Benoit Quinquis
    Kévin Da Silva
    Florian Plaza Oñate
    Nicolas Pons
    Hugo Roume
    Mircea Podar
    Mathieu Almeida
    [J]. Scientific Data, 9
  • [3] On the study of microbial transcriptomes using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies
    Sang Chul Choi
    [J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 54 : 527 - 536
  • [4] Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis
    Pei, Surui
    Liu, Tao
    Ren, Xue
    Li, Weizhong
    Chen, Chongjian
    Xie, Zhi
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (03)
  • [5] A window into third-generation sequencing
    Schadt, Eric E.
    Turner, Steve
    Kasarskis, Andrew
    [J]. HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2010, 19 : R227 - R240
  • [6] Cheap third-generation sequencing
    Rusk, Nicole
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2009, 6 (04) : 244 - 245
  • [7] Third-Generation Sequencing Debuts
    Glaser, Vicki
    [J]. GENETIC ENGINEERING & BIOTECHNOLOGY NEWS, 2010, 30 (08): : 30 - 33
  • [8] Comparing the significance of the utilization of next generation and third generation sequencing technologies in microbial metagenomics
    Akacin, Ilayda
    Ersoy, Seymanur
    Doluca, Osman
    Gungormusler, Mine
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 264
  • [9] Comparing the significance of the utilization of next generation and third generation sequencing technologies in microbial metagenomics
    Akaçin, İlayda
    Ersoy, Şeymanur
    Doluca, Osman
    Güngörmüşler, Mine
    [J]. Microbiological Research, 2022, 264
  • [10] Cheap third-generation sequencing
    Nicole Rusk
    [J]. Nature Methods, 2009, 6 : 244 - 244