The utility of FDG-PET for assessing outcomes in oligometastatic cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: a cohort study

被引:31
|
作者
Solanki, Abhishek A. [1 ]
Weichselbaum, Ralph R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Appelbaum, Daniel [4 ]
Farrey, Karl [1 ]
Yenice, Kamil M. [1 ]
Chmura, Steven J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Salama, Joseph K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiat & Cellular Oncol, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Canc Res Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Ludwig Ctr Metastasis Res, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27713 USA
关键词
Stereotactic body radiotherapy; SBRT; oligometastasis; PET response; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; RADIATION-THERAPY; RECURRENT HEAD; LUNG-CANCER; PHASE-III; FLUOROURACIL; IRINOTECAN; LEUCOVORIN;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-7-216
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Studies suggest that patients with metastases limited in number and destination organ benefit from metastasis-directed therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is commonly used for metastasis directed therapy in this group. However, the characterization of PET response following SBRT is unknown in this population. We analyzed our cohort of patients to describe the PET response following SBRT. Methods: Patients enrolled on a prospective dose escalation trial of SBRT to all known sites of metastatic disease were reviewed to select patients with pre-and post-therapy PET scans. Response to SBRT was characterized on PET imaging based on standard PET response criteria and compared to CT based RECIST criteria for each treated lesion. Results: 31 patients had PET and CT data available before and after treatment for analysis in this study. In total, 58 lesions were treated (19 lung, 11 osseous, 11 nodal, 9 liver, 6 adrenal and 2 soft tissue metastases). Median follow-up was 14 months (range: 3-41). Median time to first post-therapy PET was 1.2 months (range; 0.5-4.1). On initial post-therapy PET evaluation, 96% (56/58) of treated metastases responded to therapy. 60% (35/58) had a complete response (CR) on PET and 36% (21/58) had a partial response (PR). Of 22 patients with stable disease (SD) on initial CT scan, 13 had CR on PET, 8 had PR, and one had SD. Of 21 metastases with PET PR, 38% became CR, 52% remained PR, and 10% had progressive disease on follow-up PET. 10/35 lesions (29%) with an initial PET CR progressed on follow-up PET scan with median time to progression of 4.11 months (range: 2.75-9.56). Higher radiation dose correlated with long-term PET response. Conclusions: PET response to SBRT enables characterization of metastatic response in tumors non-measurable by CT. Increasing radiation dose is associated with prolonged complete response on PET.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The utility of FDG-PET for assessing outcomes in oligometastatic cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: a cohort study
    Abhishek A Solanki
    Ralph R Weichselbaum
    Daniel Appelbaum
    Karl Farrey
    Kamil M Yenice
    Steven J Chmura
    Joseph K Salama
    Radiation Oncology, 7
  • [2] Clinical outcomes of bone stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancer
    Jensen, S. H. O.
    Bentzen, L. Norgaard
    Worm, E. Schjodt
    Wang, M.
    Lassen-Ramshad, Y.
    Buus, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1234 - S1235
  • [3] Choline PET/CT and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients
    Pasqualetti, F.
    Panichi, M.
    Sainato, A.
    Matteucci, F.
    Derosa, L.
    Cocuzza, P.
    Coraggio, G.
    Ferrazza, P.
    Montrone, S.
    Cantarella, M.
    Delishaj, D.
    Cristaudo, A.
    Fabrini, M.
    Greco, C.
    Erba, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S353 - S354
  • [4] Outcomes of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
    Benson, K.
    Sandhu, N.
    Zhang, C.
    Ko, R. B.
    Toesca, D. A. S.
    Von Eyben, R.
    Diehn, M.
    Bush, K.
    Maxim, P. G.
    Gensheimer, M. F.
    Soltys, S. G.
    Loo, B. W., Jr.
    Pollom, E.
    Chang, D. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E161 - E162
  • [5] Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Gynecological Cancer
    Laliscia, Concetta
    Fabrini, Maria Grazia
    Delishaj, Durim
    Morganti, Riccardo
    Greco, Carlo
    Cantarella, Martina
    Tana, Roberta
    Paiar, Fabiola
    Gadducci, Angiolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (02) : 396 - 402
  • [6] VMAT Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients: role of FDG PET/CT
    BORGHES, S., I
    Gasperi, C.
    Terziani, F.
    Curion, A. S.
    Rampini, A.
    Pernici, P.
    Bertocci, S.
    Gennari, P. G.
    Iermano, C.
    De Majo, R.
    Losardo, P. L.
    Tucci, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1227 - S1228
  • [7] Oligometastatic Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Treated Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Narayan, Satya
    Pareek, Puneet
    Soni, Tej Prakash
    Soni, Sweta
    Bagri, Puneet
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03): : 345 - 348
  • [8] Characteristics of FDG-PET images after stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer
    Matsuo, Y.
    Nakamoto, Y.
    Nagata, Y.
    Mizowaki, T.
    Takayama, K.
    Sakamoto, M.
    Norihisa, Y.
    Narita, Y.
    Togashi, K.
    Hiraoka, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S471 - S471
  • [9] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in bone oligometastatic prostate cancer patients
    Trippa, F.
    Arcidiacono, F.
    Di Marzo, A.
    Draghini, L.
    Anselmo, P.
    Terenzi, S.
    Casale, M.
    Fabiani, S.
    Maranzano, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S850 - S851
  • [10] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients
    Chaw, C. L.
    Henderson, D.
    Khoo, V.
    Tree, A.
    Eeles, R.
    Van As, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S209 - S209