A Rasch-Validated Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index for Interval-Level Measurement of Upper Extremity Function

被引:28
|
作者
Hamilton, Clayon B. [1 ,2 ]
Chesworth, Bert M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Grad Program Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Elborn Coll, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Collaborat Grad Program Musculoskeletal Hlth Res, Elborn Coll, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Phys Therapy, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[5] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, London, ON, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2013年 / 93卷 / 11期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
OF-THE-LITERATURE; SHOULDER FUNCTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; MEASUREMENT MODEL; OUTCOME MEASURE; SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RELIABILITY; DASH; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20130041
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The original 20-item Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) has not undergone Rasch validation. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Rasch analysis supports the UEFI as a measure of a single construct (ie, upper extremity function) and whether a Rasch-validated UEFI has adequate reproducibility for individual-level patient evaluation. Design. This was a secondary analysis of data from a repeated-measures study designed to evaluate the measurement properties of the UEFI over a 3-week period. Methods. Patients (n=239) with musculoskeletal upper extremity disorders were recruited from 17 physical therapy clinics across 4 Canadian provinces. Rasch analysis of the UEFI measurement properties was performed. If the UEFI did not fit the Rasch model, misfitting patients were deleted, items with poor response structure were corrected, and misfitting items and redundant items were deleted. The impact of differential item functioning on the ability estimate of patients was investigated. Results. A 15-item modified UEFI was derived to achieve fit to the Rasch model where the total score was supported as a measure of upper extremity function only. The resultant UEFI-15 interval-level scale (0-100, worst to best state) demonstrated excellent internal consistency (person separation index=0.94) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1]=.95). The minimal detectable change at the 90% confidence interval was 8.1. Limitations. Patients who were ambidextrous or bilaterally affected were excluded to allow for the analysis of differential item functioning due to limb involvement and arm dominance. Conclusion. Rasch analysis did not support the validity of the 20-item UEFI. However, the UEFI-15 was a valid and reliable interval-level measure of a single dimension: upper extremity function. Rasch analysis supports using the UEFI-15 in physical therapist practice to quantify upper extremity function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity.
引用
收藏
页码:1507 / 1519
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upper Extremity Functional Index Reply
    Arumugam, Vanitha
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 66 (04) : 278 - 278
  • [2] Clinimetrics: Upper Extremity Functional Index
    Arumugam, Vanitha
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2018, 64 (02) : 125 - 125
  • [3] Correspondence: Upper Extremity Functional Index
    Hadadi, Mohammad
    Ebrahimi, Samaneh
    Sarvestani, Mohadeseh
    Mozafari, Maryam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 66 (04) : 278 - 278
  • [4] Outcomes measurement of upper extremity function
    Stiller, J
    Uhl, TL
    [J]. ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY, 2005, 10 (03): : 34 - 36
  • [5] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the upper extremity functional index
    Aljathlani, Mohamed F.
    Alshammari, Majed O.
    Alsuwaygh, Mashael A.
    Al-Mutairi, Mohammed S.
    Aljassir, Fawzi F.
    Bindawas, Saad M.
    Alnahdi, Ali H.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5656 - 5662
  • [6] Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications
    Rowe, Veronica T.
    Winstein, Carolee J.
    Wolf, Steven L.
    Woodbury, Michelle L.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (10): : 1977 - 1983
  • [7] Psychometric properties of upper extremity outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis: a systematic review
    Hong, Ickpyo
    Bonilha, Heather S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [8] Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Greek Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index
    Karanasios, Stefanos
    Kampourakis, Georgios
    Ntoulaveris, Ilias
    Kouvaras, Kosmas
    Lignos, Ioannis
    Diamantopoulos, Nikolaos
    Gioftsos, George
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [9] Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in people with chronic stroke
    Pan, Hong
    Ng, Shamay S. M.
    Liu, Tai Wa
    Tsoh, Joshua
    Wong, Thomson W. L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] Evaluation of the validity of the Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index for children
    Wright, FV
    Hubbard, S
    Naumann, S
    Jutai, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (04): : 518 - 527