Rapid and asymmetric divergence of duplicate genes in the human gene coexpression network

被引:34
|
作者
Chung, WY
Albert, R
Albert, I
Nekrutenko, A
Makova, KD [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Phys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Huck Inst Life Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Ctr Comparat Genom & Bioinformat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-7-46
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: While gene duplication is known to be one of the most common mechanisms of genome evolution, the fates of genes after duplication are still being debated. In particular, it is presently unknown whether most duplicate genes preserve ( or subdivide) the functions of the parental gene or acquire new functions. One aspect of gene function, that is the expression profile in gene coexpression network, has been largely unexplored for duplicate genes. Results: Here we build a human gene coexpression network using human tissue-specific microarray data and investigate the divergence of duplicate genes in it. The topology of this network is scale-free. Interestingly, our analysis indicates that duplicate genes rapidly lose shared coexpressed partners: after approximately 50 million years since duplication, the two duplicate genes in a pair have only slightly higher number of shared partners as compared with two random singletons. We also show that duplicate gene pairs quickly acquire new coexpressed partners: the average number of partners for a duplicate gene pair is significantly greater than that for a singleton ( the latter number can be used as a proxy of the number of partners for a parental singleton gene before duplication). The divergence in gene expression between two duplicates in a pair occurs asymmetrically: one gene usually has more partners than the other one. The network is resilient to both random and degree-based in silico removal of either singletons or duplicate genes. In contrast, the network is especially vulnerable to the removal of highly connected genes when duplicate genes and singletons are considered together. Conclusion: Duplicate genes rapidly diverge in their expression profiles in the network and play similar role in maintaining the network robustness as compared with singletons.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid and asymmetric divergence of duplicate genes in the human gene coexpression network
    Wen-Yu Chung
    Reka Albert
    Istvan Albert
    Anton Nekrutenko
    Kateryna D Makova
    BMC Bioinformatics, 7
  • [2] Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes
    Conant, GC
    Wagner, A
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (09) : 2052 - 2058
  • [3] Asymmetric functional divergence of duplicate genes in yeast
    Wagner, A
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (10) : 1760 - 1768
  • [4] Divergence in the spatial pattern of gene expression between human duplicate genes
    Makova, KD
    Li, WH
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (07) : 1638 - 1645
  • [5] Large Scale of Human Duplicate Genes Divergence
    Vinogradov, Alexander E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 2012, 75 (1-2) : 25 - 33
  • [6] Large Scale of Human Duplicate Genes Divergence
    Alexander E. Vinogradov
    Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2012, 75 : 25 - 33
  • [7] Rapid divergence and diversification of mammalian duplicate gene functions
    Assis, Raquel
    Bachtrog, Doris
    BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [8] Rapid divergence and diversification of mammalian duplicate gene functions
    Raquel Assis
    Doris Bachtrog
    BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15
  • [9] Divergence of Gene Body DNA Methylation and Evolution of Plant Duplicate Genes
    Wang, Jun
    Marowsky, Nicholas C.
    Fan, Chuanzhu
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [10] Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data
    Gu, ZL
    Nicolae, D
    Lu, HHS
    Li, WH
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2002, 18 (12) : 609 - 613