Design of Experiments in the Methodology for Interoperability Testing: Evaluating AMI Message Exchange

被引:7
|
作者
Andreadou, Nikoleta [1 ]
Lucas, Alexandre [1 ]
Tarantola, Stefano [1 ]
Poursanidis, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Joint Res Ctr, Energy Secur Distribut & Markets Unit, Directorate Energy Transport & Climate, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
interoperability; design of experiments; smart meter; advanced metering infrastructure;
D O I
10.3390/app9061221
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Interoperability is a challenge for the realisation of smart grids. In this work, we apply the methodology for interoperability testing and the design of experiments developed at the Smart Grids Interoperability Laboratory of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission on a simple use case. The methodology is based on the Smart Grid Architecture Model (SGAM) of CEN/CENELEC/ETSI and includes the concept of Basic Application Profiles (BAP) and Basic Application Interoperability Profiles (BAIOP). The relevant elements of the methodology are the design of experiments and the sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, which can reveal the limits of a system under test and give valuable feedback about the critical conditions which do not guarantee interoperability. The design and analysis of experiments employed in the Joint Research Centre (JRC) methodology supply information about the crucial parameters that either lead to an acceptable system performance or to a failure of interoperability. The use case on which the methodology is applied describes the interaction between a data concentrator and one or more smart meters. Experimental results are presented that show the applicability of the methodology and the design of experiments in practice. The system is tested under different conditions by varying two parameters: the rate at which meter data are requested by the data concentrator and the number of smart meters connected to the data concentrator. With this use case example the JRC methodology is illustrated at work, and its effectiveness for testing interoperability of a system under stress conditions is highlighted.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interoperability Modelling Methodology for Product Design Organisations
    Merlo, Christophe
    Vicien, Guillaume
    Ducq, Yves
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (15) : 4379 - 4395
  • [2] A Design of Experiments Methodology for Evaluating Configuration for a Generation Next Main Battle Tank
    Rahman, A. H.
    Malik, S. A.
    Kumar, J. R.
    Balaguru, V.
    Sivakumar, P.
    DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 68 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [3] Evaluating the effectiveness of a design methodology
    Karuppoor, SS
    Burger, CP
    Chona, R
    Ward, TB
    SHARING EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2002, : 141 - 148
  • [4] Artemis message exchange framework: Semantic interoperability of exchanged messages in the healthcare domain
    Bicer, V
    Laleci, GB
    Dogac, A
    Kabak, Y
    SIGMOD RECORD, 2005, 34 (03) : 71 - 76
  • [5] DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS EVALUATING ANALGESICS
    GRUBER, CM
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1962, 23 (05) : 711 - &
  • [6] Standardized file exchange eases fieldbus interoperability design
    Tomita, S
    Hawkins, W
    Akiyama, C
    INTECH, 1997, 44 (03) : 46 - 49
  • [7] ELECTRONIC DESIGN METHODOLOGY IN LAB EXPERIMENTS
    Jimenez Fernandez, Carlos J.
    Lopez Ojeda, Antonio
    Leon de Mora, Carlos
    PIXEL-BIT- REVISTA DE MEDIOS Y EDUCACION, 2010, (37): : 19 - 27
  • [8] Evaluating Interoperability Artifacts for the Exchange of Public Service Information: Outline of a Conceptual Framework
    Jahns, Veit
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 231 - 238
  • [9] A proposal of message exchange for concurrent design systems
    Ito, T
    Fukuda, S
    ADVANCES IN CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: CE99, 1999, 99 : 209 - 215
  • [10] Improving Interoperability of Engineering Tools - Data Exchange in Plant Design
    Fillinger, Sandra
    Bonart, Henning
    Welscher, Wolfgang
    Esche, Erik
    Repke, Jens-Uwe
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2017, 89 (11) : 1454 - 1463