Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Use of an Accessory Medial Portal Versus Traditional Transtibial Drilling

被引:79
|
作者
Tompkins, Marc [1 ]
Milewski, Matthew D. [1 ]
Brockmeier, Stephen F. [1 ]
Gaskin, Cree M. [1 ]
Hart, Joseph M. [1 ]
Miller, Mark D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2012年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词
ACL reconstruction; femoral footprint; femoral tunnel; accessory medial portal; transtibial; SINGLE-BUNDLE; TIBIAL TUNNEL; GRAFT SIZE; PLACEMENT; LANDMARKS; POSITION; ATTACHMENTS; STABILITY; LOCATION; APERTURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546512443047
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: During anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, we have found that the femoral footprint can best be visualized from the anteromedial portal. Independent femoral tunnel drilling can then be performed through an accessory medial portal, medial and inferior to the standard anteromedial portal. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of independent femoral tunnel placement relative to the ACL footprint using an accessory medial portal versus tunnel placement with a traditional transtibial technique. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees were randomized such that within each pair, one knee underwent arthroscopic transtibial (TT) drilling, and the other underwent drilling through an accessory medial portal (AM). All knees underwent computed tomography (CT) both preoperatively and postoperatively with a technique optimized for ligament evaluation (80 keV with maximum mAs). Computed tomography was performed with a dual-energy scanner. Commercially available third-party software was used to fuse the preoperative and postoperative CT scans, allowing anatomic comparison of the ACL footprint to the drilled tunnel. The ACL footprint was marked in consensus by an orthopaedic surgeon and a musculoskeletal radiologist and then compared with the tunnel aperture after drilling. The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint as well as the distance from the center of the tunnel aperture to the center of the footprint was measured. Results: The AM technique placed 97.7% +/- 5% of the tunnel within the native femoral footprint, significantly more than 61.2% +/- 24% for the TT technique (P = .001). The AM technique placed the center of the femoral tunnel 3.6 +/- 1.2 mm from the center of the native footprint, significantly closer than 6.0 +/- 1.9 mm for the TT technique (P = .003). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that use of an accessory medial portal will facilitate more accurate placement of the femoral tunnel in the native ACL femoral footprint. Clinical Relevance: More accurate placement of the femoral tunnel in the native ACL femoral footprint should improve the ability to achieve more anatomic positioning of the ACL graft.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1321
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Tunnel Characteristics Using an Accessory Medial Portal Versus Traditional Transtibial Drilling
    Tompkins, Marc
    Cosgrove, Christopher T.
    Milewski, Matthew D.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Hart, Joseph M.
    Miller, Mark D.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (03): : 550 - 555
  • [3] Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position
    Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
    Britta L. Swanson
    Kyle E. Swanson
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 846 - 850
  • [4] Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position
    Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia
    Swanson, Britta L.
    Swanson, Kyle E.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (04) : 846 - 850
  • [5] The Anteromedial Portal for Drilling of the Femoral Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Georgoulis, A.
    Tokis, A.
    Bernard, M.
    Paessler, H.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 228 - 229
  • [6] Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Drilling for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Femoral Tunnel Length and Obliquity
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Raphael, Brad
    Maderazo, Alex
    Pavlov, Helene
    Williams, Riley J., III
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (03): : 342 - 350
  • [7] Femoral Tunnel Length: Accessory Anteromedial Portal Drilling Versus Transtibial Drilling
    Ilahi, Omer A.
    Ventura, N. Janet
    Qadeer, Amad A.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (04): : 486 - 491
  • [8] Medial Portal Drilling: Effects on the Femoral Tunnel Aperture Morphology During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Hensler, Daniel
    Working, Zachary M.
    Illingworth, Kenneth D.
    Thorhauer, Eric D.
    Tashman, Scott
    Fu, Freddie H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (22): : 2063 - 2071
  • [9] Transtibial versus independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of femoral aperture positioning
    Haroun, Haitham K.
    Abouelsoud, Maged M.
    Allam, Mohamed R.
    Abdelwahab, Mahmoud M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [10] Transtibial versus independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of femoral aperture positioning
    Haitham K. Haroun
    Maged M. Abouelsoud
    Mohamed R. Allam
    Mahmoud M. Abdelwahab
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17