Clinical performance of the Panbio assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in COVID-19 patients

被引:6
|
作者
Haguet, Helene [1 ]
Douxfils, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Eucher, Christine [3 ]
Elsen, Marc [3 ]
Cadrobbi, Julie [3 ]
Tre-Hardy, Marie [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Dogne, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Favresse, Julien [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Namur, Namur Res Inst LIfe Sci, Dept Pharm, Namur, Belgium
[2] Qualiblood Sa, Namur, Belgium
[3] Clin St Luc Bouge, Dept Lab Med, Namur, Belgium
[4] Iris Hosp South, Dept Lab Med, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Med, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
COVID-19; kinetics; rapid test; SARS-CoV-2; serology;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.26884
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Following the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, numerous serological tests have been developed, including rapid diagnostic tests. This study aims at assessing the clinical performance of the Panbio immunoglobulin G (IgG)/IgM coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) test (Abbott), a rapid lateral flow assay for the qualitative detection of IgG and IgM against SARS-CoV-2. One hundred and thirty-eight samples from 95 COVID-19 patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction were analyzed to assess the clinical sensitivity. Seventy-six pre-COVID-19 samples were used to evaluate the clinical specificity. Two independent and blinded raters determined visually the presence or absence of the IgG, IgM, and control lines for each test after 10 and 20 min. The sensitivity obtained from collected samples more than 14 days after the onset of symptoms was 95.2% for IgG. IgM was less frequently detected (highest sensitivity of 20.5%). The specificities obtained were 98.7% and 100% for IgG and IgM, respectively. In addition, the sensitivity of the assay was better when the reading was performed at 20 min than at 10 min, whereas the specificity was unchanged. The Panbio COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test detects IgG with high sensitivity 14 days since symptom onset but presents a low sensitivity for IgM. The specificity was excellent for both IgG and IgM.
引用
收藏
页码:3277 / 3281
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG responses in COVID-19 patients
    Sun, Baoqing
    Feng, Ying
    Mo, Xiaoneng
    Zheng, Peiyan
    Wang, Qian
    Li, Pingchao
    Peng, Ping
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Zhilong
    Huang, Huimin
    Zhang, Fan
    Luo, Wenting
    Niu, Xuefeng
    Hu, Peiyu
    Wan, Longyu
    Peng, Hui
    Huang, Zhifeng
    Feng, Liqiang
    Li, Feng
    Zhang, Fuchun
    Li, Fang
    Zhong, Nanshan
    Chen, Ling
    [J]. EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS, 2020, 9 (01) : 940 - 948
  • [2] Transition of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Antibodies Production in the Patients with COVID-19
    Matsunaga, T.
    Ohta, S.
    Kimura, T.
    Fukuda, Y.
    Jinno, M.
    Hirai, K.
    Miyata, Y.
    Kishino, Y.
    Inoue, H.
    Homma, T.
    Kusumoto, S.
    Suzuki, S.
    Tanaka, A.
    Sagara, H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [3] The dynamic changes of serum IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19
    Zhou, Wei
    Xu, Xiaomao
    Chang, Zhigang
    Wang, He
    Zhong, Xuefeng
    Tong, Xunliang
    Liu, Taotao
    Li, Yanming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (02) : 924 - 933
  • [4] A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay
    Batra, Rahul
    Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez
    Rubin, Delfin
    Vallari, Ana
    Pearce, Sandra
    Olivo, Ana
    Prostko, John
    Nebbia, Gaia
    Douthwaite, Sam
    Rodgers, Mary
    Cloherty, Gavin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [5] Evaluation of the performance of Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in suspected patients in Ethiopia
    Dessalegn, Dejene
    Tola, Edosa Kifle
    Tamiru, Afework
    Zerfu, Biruk
    [J]. SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 10
  • [6] Longitudinal Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Seropositivity to Detect COVID-19
    Suhandynata, Raymond T.
    Hoffman, Melissa A.
    Kelner, Michael J.
    McLawhon, Ronald W.
    Reed, Sharon L.
    Fitzgerald, Robert L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 5 (05): : 908 - 920
  • [7] Dynamics of Detection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM and SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Respiratory Tract Specimens in 48 COVID-19 Patients
    Wu, Endong
    Zhang, Xinyong
    Zheng, Yue
    Luo, Zujin
    Zhai, Wenliang
    Yin, Zhenzhen
    Chen, Duo
    Wang, Zhengfang
    Zhai, Junpeng
    Han, Yujuan
    Liu, Huan
    Li, Ruizhi
    Wang, Yanran
    Feng, Yaohui
    Shi, Gangli
    Ma, Yingmin
    [J]. CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2021, 67 (11) : 2400 - 2406
  • [8] Performance of the FREND™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM Duo point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection
    De Munck, Dorien G.
    Peeters, Bart
    Huyghe, Evelyne
    Goossens, Herman
    Ieven, Margareta
    Matheeussen, Veerle
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2022, 77 (03) : 647 - 652
  • [9] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Zhou, Jin-an
    Zeng, Hao-long
    Deng, Ling-yan
    Li, Hui-jun
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [10] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Jin-an Zhou
    Hao-long Zeng
    Ling-yan Deng
    Hui-jun Li
    [J]. Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 318 - 322