Does Size Still Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Victorian Local Authorities

被引:17
|
作者
Drew, Joseph [1 ]
Dollery, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Business, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
关键词
Australia; effectiveness; local government; optimal council size; CITIZEN SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; SERVICE SATISFACTION; MANAGEMENT; DENSITY; IMPACT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/03003930.2013.869497
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Efficiency approaches to the question of whether population size matters to optimal local government have proved largely inconclusive. However, recent exploratory empirical work employing an effectiveness approach - as proxied by citizen satisfaction survey data - offers a promising way forward. The present paper seeks to build upon an earlier cross-sectional analysis of Victorian local government by employing longitudinal data over a three-year period - 2008 to 2010 - for Victorian local authorities. The greater depth of data confirmed the positive associations with population density but suggests that negative linear relationships dominate over parabolic associations for population size. This result underlines the need for the collection of more local government citizen satisfaction data by Australian local government systems, given its potentially fruitful application in tackling contentious questions in contemporary local government policy debates.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities
    Andrews, Rhys
    Boyne, George A.
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2009, 46 (04) : 739 - 759
  • [2] SIZE, EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF LOCAL EDUCATION AUTHORITIES
    OWENS, EEL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 1969, 1 (02): : 30 - 39
  • [3] Catalyst effectiveness: Size does matter
    Canter, Neil
    [J]. TRIBOLOGY & LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 66 (02) : 14 - 15
  • [4] Uveal melanoma in 2020: Does size still matter?
    Lim, Li-Anne S.
    Giblin, Michael E.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 48 (05): : 554 - 557
  • [5] Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence from Poland
    Fonfara, Krzysztof
    Hauke-Lopes, Aleksandra
    Soniewicki, Marcin
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 29 (04) : 32 - 56
  • [6] LOCAL EXCISION OF RECTAL LESIONS: DOES SIZE MATTER?
    Orkin, B.
    Fischkoff, K.
    Choxi, S.
    Obias, V.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (04) : 638 - 639
  • [7] The application of intellectual capital reports in local authorities: analysis and empirical evidence
    Bronzetti, Giovanni
    Sicoli, Graziella
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 2 (01) : 85 - 106
  • [8] In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter?
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Mills, Edward J.
    Elbourne, Diana
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [9] Tumor size and nephron-sparing surgery:: Does it still matter?
    Bensalah, Karim
    Crepel, Maxime
    Patard, Jean-Jacques
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (04) : 691 - 693
  • [10] Computed Tomography in the Management of Adrenal Tumors: Does Size Still Matter?
    Azoury, Said C.
    Nagarajan, Neeraja
    Young, Allen
    Mathur, Aarti
    Prescott, Jason D.
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    Zeiger, Martha A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (04) : 628 - 632