Stiffness of different designs and cross-sections of maxillary and mandibular major connectors of removable partial dentures

被引:14
|
作者
Ben-Ur, Z [1 ]
Mijiritsky, E
Gorfil, C
Brosh, T
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Rehabil, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Operat Dent, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 1999年 / 81卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70206-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Major connectors of removable partial dentures must distribute forces bilaterally without damaging the supporting tissues. Purpose. This study investigated which design and cross-sectional shape of major connectors most favorably influence rigidity and flexibility. Methods and material. Five designs for maxillary removable partial denture major connectors and 5 lingual bar major connectors of different cross-sectional forms were cast in chrome cobalt alloy on a master cast. Points M and P, which represented the position of the first premolar and second molar teeth, were positioned 20 mm apart on the casting. Vertical and horizontal forces were applied to each point while the opposite side was gripped in an Instron testing machine. A force-deflection curve was obtained for each loading point. Mean stiffness values were obtained for loading in compression and torsion. Results. Values for torsional loading simulating vertical forces were lower when compared with values obtained for compression loading that simulated horizontal occlusal forces. Differences in stiffness were greater in mandibular major connectors loaded at M and P. The half pear-shaped cross section was the stiffest. Conclusions. In the maxillary arch, the most rigid major connector was the anteroposterior palatal bar combination placed on different horizontal and vertical planes. The most flexible was the U-shaped design. In the mandibular arch, the most important factor in achieving rigidity was the cross-sectional shape of the major connector. The half pear-shaped cross section proved to be the most rigid.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Stiffness of different designs and cross-sections of upper and lower major connectors of removable partial dentures.
    BenUr, Z
    Brosh, T
    Mijiritsky, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (05) : 1165 - 1165
  • [2] MAJOR CONNECTORS FOR MANDIBULAR REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURES - DESIGN AND FUNCTION
    HENDERSON, D
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1973, 30 (04): : 532 - 548
  • [3] COMPARISON OF MAJOR CONNECTORS FOR REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURES
    WAGNER, AG
    TRAWEEK, FC
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 47 (03): : 242 - 245
  • [4] A LABORATORY EXAMINATION OF THE RIGIDITY OF MAJOR CONNECTORS FOR REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURES
    COHEN, KD
    FAIGENBLUM, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (04) : 856 - 856
  • [5] Influence of Oral Morphology on Speech Production in Subjects Wearing Maxillary Removable Partial Dentures with Major Connectors
    Wada, Junichiro
    Hideshima, Masayuki
    Inukai, Shusuke
    Katsuki, Azusa
    Matsuura, Hiroshi
    Wakabayashi, Noriyuki
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2018, 70 (3-4) : 138 - 148
  • [6] Maxillary and mandibular overlay removable partial dentures for the restoration of worn teeth
    Ganddini, MR
    Al-Mardini, M
    Graser, GN
    Almog, D
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 91 (03): : 210 - 214
  • [7] CINGULUM BAR AS A MAJOR CONNECTOR FOR MANDIBULAR REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURES
    MEEUWISSEN, R
    KELTJENS, HMAM
    BATTISTUZZI, PGFCM
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 66 (02): : 221 - 223
  • [8] Comparison of deformation by stereophotogrammetry of various kinds of major connectors in maxillary Kennedy Class I removable partial dentures
    Özkan, P
    Aydin, AK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2001, 14 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [9] SUBJECTIVE REACTIONS TO MAJOR CONNECTOR DESIGNS FOR REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURES
    CAMPBELL, LD
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1977, 37 (05): : 507 - 516
  • [10] Frequency of the various classes of removable partial dentures and selection of major connectors and direct/indirect retainers
    Keyf, F.
    2001, TUBITAK (31) : 445 - 449