Assessment of Government Incentives for Energy from Waste in Colombia

被引:42
|
作者
Alzate-Arias, Santiago [1 ]
Jaramillo-Duque, Alvaro [2 ]
Villada, Fernando [2 ]
Restrepo-Cuestas, Bonie [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Tecnol Metropolitano, Res Grp Adv Mat & Energy MATyER, Calle 54A 30-01, Medellin 050013, Colombia
[2] Univ Antioquia, Res Grp Efficient Energy Management GIMEL, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Calle 67 53-108, Medellin 050110, Colombia
关键词
energy policies; waste-to-energy; municipal solid waste; levelized cost of electricity; internal rate of return; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; TO-ENERGY; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LANDFILL GAS; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; WTE PLANTS; GASIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; MSW;
D O I
10.3390/su10041294
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the prefeasibility of energy from waste projects in Colombia under the guidelines of Law 1715. That piece of legislation proposes tax incentives for non-conventional energy initiatives, such as deductions of up to 50% on the investment through income tax, VAT exemption, tariff exemption, and accelerated depreciation of assets. Pasto, Colombia, was selected as the case study. Subsequently, incineration, gasification, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas technologies were evaluated. The potential of electric power generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) of each conversion technology was estimated with mathematical models. Additionally, the economic evaluation considered five cases that combine loan options, accelerated depreciation, and income deductions. Finally, the prefeasibility analysis of each case and technology was based on the internal rate of return (IRR) and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The results reveal that only anaerobic digestion and landfill gas technologies constitute viable projects in case of traditional investment with and without loans, because they present IRRs greater than the discount rate, of 6.8%. However, by including the incentives in Law 1715 in the economic evaluation, IRRs of 11.18%, 7.96%, 14.27%, and 13.59% were obtained for incineration, gasification, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas, respectively. These results make all four technologies feasible in this context.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of incentives for renewable energy in Colombia
    Efectos de los incentivos para energías renovables en Colombia
    [J]. 1600, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (21):
  • [2] Government Incentives and Supports for Renewable Energy
    Cakmak, Munci
    Isbir, Begum
    [J]. ENERGY SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 217 - 227
  • [4] SOCIAL-OPTIMAL HOUSEHOLD FOOD WASTE: TAXES AND GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES
    Katare, Bhagyashree
    Serebrennikov, Dmytro
    Wang, H. Holly
    Wetzstein, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 99 (02) : 499 - 509
  • [5] The assessment of government incentives on savings, Hungary 2006-2019
    Czeczeli, Vivien
    Kutasi, Gabor
    Szabo, Eszter
    [J]. ACTA OECONOMICA, 2021, 71 (04) : 569 - 585
  • [6] ALTERNATIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN THE USA - THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES
    LANCASTER, RR
    BERNDT, MJ
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1984, 12 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of Waste-to-Energy: Energy Recovery from Wood Waste in Malaysia
    Choong, Joo Ee
    Onn, Chiu Chuen
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    Mohd, Nuruol Syuhadaa
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (04): : 2593 - 2602
  • [8] Comprehensive Analysis of Solid Waste for Energy Projects in Colombia
    Ossa, Diego Alejandro
    Aristizabal, Andres Julian
    Ospina, Daniel
    [J]. ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2020, 24 (01): : 35 - 52
  • [9] GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES TO EXPLORATION
    FULFORD, G
    GOBLE, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 17 (01): : 27 - 27
  • [10] INCENTIVES IN GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS
    REICHELSTEIN, S
    OSBAND, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1984, 24 (02) : 257 - 269