Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial

被引:67
|
作者
Henry, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Madan, Arushi [1 ]
Reid, Rachel [1 ,3 ]
Tracy, Sally K. [1 ,3 ]
Austin, Kathryn [2 ]
Welsh, Alec [1 ,2 ]
Challis, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[2] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Midwifery & Womens Hlth Res Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
关键词
Induction of labour; Mechanical ripening; Prostaglandin; Foley catheter; Randomised controlled trial; Unfavourable cervix;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-13-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the commonest obstetric interventions, with significant impact on both the individual woman and health service delivery. Outpatient IOL is an attractive option to reduce these impacts. To date there is little data comparing outpatient and inpatient IOL methods, and potential safety concerns (hyperstimulation) if prostaglandins, the standard inpatient IOL medications, are used in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility, clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of outpatient Foley catheter (OPC) vs. inpatient vaginal PGE2 (IP) for induction of labour (IOL) at term. Methods: Women with an unfavourable cervix requiring IOL at term (N = 101) were randomised to outpatient care using Foley catheter (OPC, n = 50) or inpatient care using vaginal PGE2 (IP, n = 51). OPC group had Foley catheter inserted and were discharged overnight following a reassuring cardiotocograph. IP group received 2 mg/1 mg vaginal PGE2 if nulliparous or 1 mg/1 mg if multiparous. Main outcome measures were inpatient stay (prior to birth, in Birthing Unit, total), mode of birth, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction. Results: OPC group had shorter hospital stay prior to birth (21.3 vs. 32.4 hrs, p < .001), IP were more likely to achieve vaginal birth within 12 hours of presenting to Birthing Unit (53% vs. 28%, p = .01). Vaginal birth rates (66% OPC Vs. 71% IP), total induction to delivery time (33.5 hrs vs. 31.3 hrs) and total inpatient times (96 hrs OPC Vs. 105 hrs IP) were similar. OPC group felt less pain (significant discomfort 26% Vs 58%, p = .003), and had more sleep (5.8 Vs 3.4 hours, p < .001), during cervical preparation, but were more likely to require oxytocin IOL (88 Vs 59%, p = .001). Conclusions: OPC was feasible and acceptable for IOL of women with an unfavourable cervix at term compared to IP, however did not show a statistically significant reduction in total inpatient stay and was associated with increased oxytocin IOL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
    Amanda Henry
    Arushi Madan
    Rachel Reid
    Sally K Tracy
    Kathryn Austin
    Alec Welsh
    Daniel Challis
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13
  • [2] Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Beckmann, M.
    Gibbons, K.
    Flenady, V
    Kumar, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (05) : 571 - 579
  • [3] Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Benthem, Marjan
    van Beek, Erik
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    van Huizen, Marloes E.
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
    Perquin, Denise A. M.
    Porath, Martina
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
    Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    de Leeuw, Jan Willem
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9809): : 2095 - 2103
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter
    Austin, Kathryn
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    de Abreu Lourenco, Richard
    Madan, Arushi
    Susic, Daniella
    Henry, Amanda
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (05): : 440 - 445
  • [5] Foley catheter silicone versus latex for term outpatient induction of labour: A randomised trial
    McGee, Therese M.
    Gidaszewski, Beata
    Khajehei, Marjan
    Tse, Toni
    Gibbs, Emma
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (02): : 235 - 242
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour at term with a Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (PROBAAT trial)
    van Baaren, G. J.
    Jozwiak, M.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    Rengerink, K. Oude
    Benthem, M.
    Dijksterhuis, M. G. K.
    van Huizen, M. E.
    van der Salm, P. C. M.
    Schuitemaker, N. W. E.
    Papatsonis, D. N. M.
    Perquin, D. A. M.
    Porath, M.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Rijnders, R. J. P.
    Scheepers, H. C. J.
    Spaanderman, M.
    van Pampus, M. G.
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, K. W. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (08) : 987 - 995
  • [7] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
    Wise, Michelle R.
    Marriott, Joy
    Battin, Malcolm
    Thompson, John M. D.
    Stitely, Michael
    Sadler, Lynn
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [8] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
    Michelle R. Wise
    Joy Marriott
    Malcolm Battin
    John M. D. Thompson
    Michael Stitely
    Lynn Sadler
    Trials, 21
  • [9] Foley catheter or vaginal prostaglandin gel for labour induction
    Kelsall, Diane
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 183 (17) : 2016 - 2016
  • [10] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Khan, Z.
    Majoko, F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (13) : 1679 - 1680