Mode of vaginal delivery in breech presentation and perinatal outcome

被引:3
|
作者
Gregoric, Analena [1 ,4 ]
Bencic, Ana [1 ]
Habek, Dubravko [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Clin Hosp Sveti Duh, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Catholic Univ Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Salata 3, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
vaginal delivery; breech presentation; delivery mode; perinatal outcome; CESAREAN-SECTION; TERM; INDUCTION; POSITION; BIRTH; LABOR; STILL;
D O I
10.5603/GP.a2021.0183
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare a perinatal outcome in breech presentation depending on different modes of vaginal breech delivery (VBD). Material and methods:Over the course of 13 years (2005-2018), perinatal outcome of newborns was compared among 98 singleton pregnancies (64 term pregnancies and 34 preterm pregnancies) completed with VBD divided into six groups depending on the mode of delivery used (Bracht, Muller, Thiessen, classical arm release, Mauriceau-Levret-Veit-Smellie (MLVS), and Vermelin acute accent s spontaneous vaginal delivery). Also, maternal demographic parameters were observed.Results: Of 98 singleton pregnancies, the most frequently used mode was Thiessen (35.71%), followed by MLVS technique (25.51%), Bracht (22.45%), Vermelin (13.27%), classical arm release (2.04%) and Muller (1.02%). Newborns with Apgar score <= 7 at 5 min. were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), which included 15.31% of newborns (total 15 newborns: 1 term and 14 preterm newborns). The incidence of episiotomy was 63.27%. Seventy-point five percent of women included in the study were <= 35 years of age, and 37.76% were multiparas. Delivery was induced in 7.14% cases.Conclusions: Less-traumatizing actions during VBD have less harmful consequences and better perinatal outcome. Lower Apgar score was noted with the aggressiveness of the mode of VBD.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 734
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal outcome in breech presentation depending on the mode of vaginal delivery
    Vranjes, Maja
    Habek, Dubravko
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2008, 23 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [2] Effect of Mode of Delivery on Perinatal Outcome in Breech Presentation
    Haider, Shazia
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 9 (01): : 392 - 395
  • [3] MODE OF DELIVERY AND PERINATAL RESULTS IN BREECH PRESENTATION
    BROWN, L
    KARRISON, T
    CIBILS, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [4] Perinatal Outcome of Vaginal Breech Delivery versus Caesarean Breech Delivery in a Tertiary Care Center
    Chaudary, Rajendra Kumar
    Ghimire, Rajan
    Kafle, Deepak Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 56 (212) : 796 - 799
  • [5] Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term
    Uotila, J
    Tuimala, R
    Kirkinen, P
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (06) : 578 - 583
  • [6] Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: Increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery
    Herbst, A
    Thorngren-Jerneck, K
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 80 (08) : 731 - 737
  • [7] Perinatal results in 492 breech presentation: cesarean section vs vaginal delivery
    Ortega Marcilia, S.
    Royo Arilla, B.
    Tejero Cabrejas, E. L.
    Saviron Cornudella, R.
    Rodriguez Solanilla, B.
    Castan Mateo, S.
    Campillos Maza, J. M.
    [J]. CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2014, 41 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [8] AN EVALUATION OF BREECH PRESENTATION AND VAGINAL DELIVERY
    ZACHARIAS, LF
    HEERY, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1950, 60 (06) : 1352 - 1355
  • [9] Vaginal and abdominal delivery for breech presentation
    Kirschbaum, M
    Hermsteiner, M
    Kunzel, W
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 1998, 31 (09): : 761 - 771
  • [10] The problem of relating fetal outcome with breech presentation to mode of delivery
    Koike, T
    Minakami, H
    Sasaki, M
    Sayama, M
    Tamada, T
    Sato, I
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1996, 258 (03) : 119 - 123