Cancer in women after assisted reproductive technology

被引:35
|
作者
Luke, Barbara [1 ]
Brown, Morton B. [2 ]
Spector, Logan G. [3 ]
Missmer, Stacey A. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Leach, Richard E. [1 ]
Williams, Melanie [8 ]
Koch, Lori [9 ]
Smith, Yolanda [10 ]
Stern, Judy E. [11 ]
Ball, G. David [12 ]
Schymura, Maria J. [13 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Texas Dept State Hlth Serv, Texas Canc Registry, Canc Epidemiol & Surveillance Branch, Austin, TX USA
[9] Illinois Dept Publ Hlth, Illinois State Canc Registry, Springfield, IL 62761 USA
[10] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[11] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
[12] Seattle Reprod Med, Seattle, WA USA
[13] Bur Canc Epidemiol, New York State Canc Registry, New York State Dept Hlth, Albany, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; cancer risk; fertility; pregnancy outcome; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS; EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP; BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; FERTILITY DRUGS; OVULATION INDUCTION; CLOMIPHENE CITRATE; BIRTH-RATES; GAVE BIRTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1135
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the risk of cancer after assisted reproductive technology (ART) therapy. Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): New York, Texas, and Illinois residents between 2004 and 2009, treated with ART, comprising cycles of 113,226 women, including 53,859 women without prior ART treatment, who were linked to their respective state cancer registries and whose cycles were reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Diagnosis of cancer, as reported to the state cancer registry; standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and their 95% confidence intervals, comparing the observed to expected cancer cases based on age-specific cancer rates in the general population of each state. Result(s): Among the cohort of women without prior ART therapy, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for treatment parameters and reproductive history factors. The mean follow-up period was 4.87 years; among women without prior ART, 450 women developed 460 cancers. Women treated with ART had a statistically significantly lower risk for all cancers (for all women: SIR 0.78; CI, 0.73-0.83; women without prior ART: SIR 0.75; CI, 0.68-0.82), breast cancer, and all female genital cancers; a non-statistically-significant lower risk for endocrine and uterine cancer; and a non-statistically-significant higher risk for melanoma and ovarian cancer. Among women without prior ART, we found no statistically significant increased HR by parity, number of cycles, cumulative follicle-stimulating hormone dosage, or cycle outcome. Conclusion(s): Women initiating ART treatment have no greater risk for developing cancer after nearly 5 years of follow-up compared with the general population and with other women treated with ART. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1226
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CANCER IN WOMEN AFTER ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY.
    Luke, B.
    Brown, M. B.
    Spector, L. G.
    Missmer, S. A.
    Leach, R.
    Williams, M.
    Koch, L.
    Smith, Y.
    Stern, J. E.
    Ball, G. D.
    Schymura, M. J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E52 - E53
  • [2] ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY & RISK OF CANCER IN WOMEN.
    Luke, B.
    Spector, L. G.
    Brown, M. B.
    Schymura, M. J.
    Missmer, S. A.
    Leach, R. E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S164 - S165
  • [4] Outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in women with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meernik, Clare
    Poole, Charles
    Engel, Stephanie M.
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    Luke, Barbara
    Nichols, Hazel B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (01) : 30 - 45
  • [5] Cancer risk in children born after assisted reproductive technology
    Arshad, A.
    Sutcliffe, A. G.
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2020, 18 (04): : 226 - 230
  • [6] Psychological outcomes for women after assisted reproductive technology treatment.
    Pasch, L
    Gregorich, S
    Ouimette, A
    Wing, H
    Katz, P
    Adler, N
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S23 - S24
  • [7] Cancer risk among parous women following assisted reproductive technology
    Reigstad, M. M.
    Larsen, I. K.
    Myklebust, T. A.
    Robsahm, T. E.
    Oldereid, N. B.
    Omland, A. K.
    Vangen, S.
    Brinton, L. A.
    Storeng, R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (08) : 1952 - 1963
  • [8] Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Spector, Logan G.
    Leach, Richard E.
    Williams, Melanie
    Koch, Lori
    Smith, Yolanda R.
    Stern, Judy E.
    Ball, G. David
    Schymura, Maria J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (01) : 183 - 189
  • [9] Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technology in Women With Cesarean Scar
    Lin, Yue
    Chen, Qianqian
    Huang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Ziliang
    Chen, Cuie
    Chen, Haiying
    Jin, Fan
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery
    Coddington, Charles C.
    Gopal, Daksha
    Cui, Xiaohui
    Cabral, Howard
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Stern, Judy E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (03) : 569 - +