Comparative study of the Causal Matrix and Causal Determinant

被引:1
|
作者
Sanches, Cida [1 ]
De Sordi, Jose Osvaldo [2 ]
Ferreira Junior, Samuel [1 ]
Meireles, Manuel [1 ]
da Silva, Orlando Roque [3 ]
机构
[1] FACCAMP, Profess Masters Degree Program, BR-13231230 Campo Limpo Paulista, SP, Brazil
[2] FMU, Business Adm Doctoral Programme, BR-13211424 Jundiai, SP, Brazil
[3] FMU, Ind Engn, BR-02378280 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
root cause; Causal Matrix; Causal Determinant; systemic loops; cause and effect; Emach;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2015.1068590
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to describe and compare two methods of determining root cause with great potential for application in Operations Management, especially in the field of quality management. The problem is particularly relevant in the field of Management, where there is a need to define causal relations on a daily basis. The present study compares two methods for determining root cause for complex problems: the Causal Matrix (CM) and the Causal Determinant (CD). As a support tool in management, the CM is a technique that enables the association of causes, identifying interference between them. The CD method has already been proved effective as a tool for determining the root cause of a problem. The study compares the results obtained by these two methods when applied to the same problem. Employing a statistical analysis of the main variables of both methods, their outputs were shown to be significantly correlated and they tended to point to the same root cause. Both methods are complementary in the rigorous analyses of causal factors. The CM has the capacity to identify loops, especially the explosive loops of the system, and this identification can help to identify the necessary managerial actions required, provided that the factors involved are considered causal by the CD method.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1112
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality
    Ahn, WK
    Kim, NS
    Lassaline, ME
    Dennis, MJ
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (04) : 361 - 416
  • [2] Causal Matrix Completion
    Agarwal, Anish
    Dahleh, Munther
    Shah, Devavrat
    Shen, Dennis
    [J]. THIRTY SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING THEORY, VOL 195, 2023, 195
  • [3] Mendelian randomization study highlights hypothyroidism as a causal determinant of alopecia areata
    Zheng, Xue-Yong
    Ma, Yan-Ping
    Zhang, Bo
    Chen, Yan-Xin
    Tang, Lei
    Tai, Xiao-Hua
    Cao, Jia-Hao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [4] Comparative causal analysis in processual strategy research: A study of causal mechanisms in organizational decline and turnarounds
    Pajunen, Kalle
    [J]. STRATEGY PROCESS, 2005, 22 : 415 - 456
  • [5] Inflammation in heart failure: causal determinant or bystander?
    Georgiopoulos, Georgios
    Delialis, Dimitrios
    Aimo, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11) : 736 - 737
  • [6] Causal Identification with Matrix Equations
    Lee, Sanghack
    Bareinboim, Elias
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [7] A Comparative Study of Six Formal Models of Causal Ascription
    Benferhat, Salem
    Bonnefon, Jean-Francois
    Chasssy, Philippe
    Neves, Rui Da Silva
    Dubois, Didier
    de Saint-Cyr, Florence Dupin
    Kayser, Daniel
    Nouioua, Farid
    Nouioua-Boutouhami, Sara
    Prade, Henri
    Smaoui, Salma
    [J]. SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2008, 2008, 5291 : 47 - +
  • [8] Entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes: A comparative causal mapping study
    Jenkins, M
    Johnson, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1997, 34 (06) : 895 - 920
  • [9] Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity
    Ragin, CC
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1999, 34 (05) : 1225 - 1239
  • [10] CAUSAL INFERENCE AND COMPARATIVE METHODS
    DEFELICE, EG
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1986, 19 (03) : 415 - 437