Application of Ecosystem Services in Natural Resource Management Decision Making

被引：18

作者：

Moore, David W. ^{[1
,8
]}

Booth, Pieter ^{[2
]}

Alix, Anne ^{[3
]}

Apitz, Sabine E. ^{[4
]}

Forrow, David ^{[5
]}

Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth ^{[6
]}

Jayasundara, Nishad ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Ramboll Environ, San Diego, CA 92101 USA

[2] Exponent Inc, Bellevue, WA USA

[3] Dow AgroSci, Abingdon, Oxon, England

[4] SEA Environm Decis Ltd, Little Hadham, Herts, England

[5] Environm Agcy, Wallingford, Oxon, England

[6] Inst Potosino Invest Cient & Tecnol, AC, San Luis Potosi, Mexico

[7] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA

[8] USACE ERDC, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA

来源：

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 13卷 / 01期

关键词：

Ecosystem services; Restoration; Conservation; Land use; Decision framework; ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE; PAYMENTS; REQUIREMENTS; TRADEOFFS;

D O I：

10.1002/ieam.1838

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

An ecosystem services (ES) approach to natural resource management (NRM) can provide the framework for balancing economic, ecological, and societal drivers in decision making. The efficacy of such an approach depends on the successful execution of several key activities, from early and continuous engagement with relevant stakeholders, to development and application of ecological production functions (EPFs), to explicit recognition of uncertainty in the process. Although there are obstacles to the implementation of an ES approach in NRM, including unclear regulatory and policy frameworks and the paucity of useful EPFs, many of the tools are currently available or sufficiently developed. An ES approach can and, in some cases, should involve qualitative rather than quantitative assessment when the stakes are not very high or when quantitative approaches would not be cost effective because of highly uncertain results. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017; 13: 74-84. (C) 2016 SETAC.

引用

页码：74 / 84

页数：11

共 50 条

[1] Modeling Aesthetics to Support an Ecosystem Services Approach for Natural Resource Management Decision Making
Booth, Pieter N.
Law, Sheryl A.
Ma, Jane
Buonagurio, John
Boyd, James
Turnley, Jessica
[J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (05) : 926 - 938
[2] Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services
Vemuri, S.
Gorman, J.
[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 175 - +
[3] Application of multi-agent decision-making methods in hydrological ecosystem services management
Behboudian, Massoud
Kerachian, Reza
Motlaghzadeh, Kasra
Ashrafi, Saeed
[J]. METHODSX, 2023, 10
[4] Mainstreaming ecosystem services into decision making
Olander, Lydia
Maltby, Lorraine
[J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (10) : 539 - 539
[5] Integrating values of ecosystem services into decision making in coastal management in Xiamen
Su, Meina
Peng, Benrong
[J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 207
[6] Decision Making in Natural Resource Management: A Structured Adaptive Approach
Fuller, Angela K.
[J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 (01): : 175 - 176
[7] Simulation models and optimal decision making in natural resource management
Conroy, MJ
Moore, CT
[J]. MODELING IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: DEVELOPMENT INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION, 2001, : 91 - 104
[8] Structured Decision Making: Case Studies in Natural Resource Management
Duarte, Adam
[J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 85 (06): : 1296 - 1297
[9] Bayesian inference and decision theory - A framework for decision making in natural resource management
Dorazio, RM
Johnson, FA
[J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (02) : 556 - 563
[10] Choices, Options, and Constraints: Decision Making and Decision Spaces in Natural Resource Management
Peterson, Nicole D.
[J]. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2010, 69 (01) : 54 - 64

← 1 2 3 4 5 →