Characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion according to intervertebral space division

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Songjie [1 ]
Zang, Lei [2 ]
Lu, Qian [1 ]
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Wu, Qichao [2 ]
Chen, Xueming [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Luhe Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
lumbar vertebra; interbody fusion; CT; intervertebral space division; inner cage; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; SPINAL-FUSION; CAGES; DISKECTOMY; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004230
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAccording to intervertebral space division, the characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were assessed via computed tomography (CT) scan to provide a theoretical basis for selecting the bone grafting site of interbody fusion. MethodsThe medical records of 57 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation treated with TLIF were analysed retrospectively. In total, 57 segments received lumbar interbody fusion. A thin-layer CT scan was performed to evaluate fusion in each zone of the fusion space. ResultsThe fusion rates were 57.89% (n = 33) in the anterior cage zone, 73.68% (n = 42) in the posterior cage zone, 66.67% (n = 38) in the decompression zone, 26.32% (n = 15) in the contralateral decompression zone and 94.74% (n = 54) in the inner cage zone. There were significant differences among the fusion rates of the five zones (P < 0.001). Further pairwise comparison revealed that the fusion rates in the inner cage significantly differed from the anterior and posterior cages and decompression and contralateral decompression zones (P = 0.001, 0.002, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). ConclusionWe think the central cage zone (i.e., inner cage) should be the focus of bone grafting. Although there is small volume of bone graft on the posterior cage zone, the fusion rate is relatively high, only secondary to the inner cage zone. The fusion rate is of the contralateral decompression zone is lower although there is a bone graft.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Hiromitsu Takaoka
    Kazuhide Inage
    Yawara Eguchi
    Yasuhiro Shiga
    Takeo Furuya
    Satoshi Maki
    Yasuchika Aoki
    Masahiro Inoue
    Takayuki Fujiyoshi
    Takuya Miyamoto
    Yuji Noguchi
    Shinichiro Nakamura
    Tomoaki Kinoshita
    Takahito Kamada
    Hiroshi Takahashi
    Junya Saito
    Masaki Norimoto
    Toshiaki Kotani
    Tsuyoshi Sakuma
    Yasushi Iijima
    Tetsuhiro Ishikawa
    Tomotaka Umimura
    Mitsutoshi Ohta
    Miyako Suzuki-Narita
    Keigo Enomoto
    Takashi Sato
    Masashi Sato
    Masahiro Suzuki
    Takashi Hozumi
    Geundong Kim
    Norichika Mizuki
    Ryuto Tsuchiya
    Takuma Otagiri
    Tomohito Mukaihata
    Takahisa Hishiya
    Seiji Ohtori
    Sumihisa Orita
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [2] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Takaoka, Hiromitsu
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Furuya, Takeo
    Maki, Satoshi
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
    Miyamoto, Takuya
    Noguchi, Yuji
    Nakamura, Shinichiro
    Kinoshita, Tomoaki
    Kamada, Takahito
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Saito, Junya
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Iijima, Yasushi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Ohta, Mitsutoshi
    Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
    Enomoto, Keigo
    Sato, Takashi
    Sato, Masashi
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Hozumi, Takashi
    Kim, Geundong
    Mizuki, Norichika
    Tsuchiya, Ryuto
    Otagiri, Takuma
    Mukaihata, Tomohito
    Hishiya, Takahisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [3] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [4] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266
  • [5] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Moskowitz, A
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 33 (02) : 359 - +
  • [6] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Cesare Faldini
    Raffaele Borghi
    Mohammadreza Chehrassan
    Fabrizio Perna
    Federico Pilla
    Francesco Traina
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 429 - 430
  • [7] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Faldini, Cesare
    Borghi, Raffaele
    Chehrassan, Mohammadreza
    Perna, Fabrizio
    Pilla, Federico
    Traina, Francesco
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 : 429 - 430
  • [8] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [9] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Arvind G. Kulkarni
    Hussain Bohra
    Abhilash Dhruv
    Abhishek Sarraf
    Anupreet Bassi
    Vishwanath M. Patil
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 464 - 472
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125