Threat and Risk Assessment Methodologies in the Automotive Domain

被引:35
|
作者
Macher, Georg [1 ]
Armengaud, Eric [1 ]
Brenner, Eugen [2 ]
Kreiner, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] AVL List GmbH, Hans List Pl 1, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ Technol, Inffeldgasse 16, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
ISO; 26262; HARA; STRIDE; automotive systems; safety / security co-engineering;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.268
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Safety and security are both qualities that concern the overall system. However, these disciplines are traditionally treated independently in the automotive domain. Replacement of classical mechanical systems with safety-critical embedded systems raised the awareness of the safety attribute and caused the introduction of the ISO 26262 standard. In contrast to this, security topics are traditionally seen as attacks of a mechanical nature and as only affecting single vehicles (e.g. door lock and immobilizer related). Due to the increasing interlacing of automotive systems with networks (such as Car2X), new features like autonomous driving, and online software updates, it is no longer acceptable to assume that car fleets are immune to security risks and automated remote attacks. Consequently, future automotive systems development requires appropriate systematic approaches to support cyber security and safety aware development. Therefore, this paper examines threat and risk assessment techniques that are available for the automotive domain and presents an approach to classify cyber-security threats, which can be used to determine the appropriate number of countermeasures that need to be considered. Furthermore, we present a combined approach for safety and security analysis to be applied in early development phases, which is a pre-requisite for consistent engineering throughout the development lifecycle. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1294
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seven Pain Points of Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment in the Automotive Domain
    Tuma, Katja
    Widman, Mathias
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2021, 19 (05) : 78 - 82
  • [2] Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment in Automotive Cyber Security
    Ward, David
    Ibarra, Ireri
    Ruddle, Alastair
    [J]. SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2013, 6 (02): : 507 - 513
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment Methodologies for Connected and Automated Vehicles
    Benyahya, Meriem
    Lenard, Teri
    Collen, Anastasija
    Nijdam, Niels Alexander
    [J]. 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY & SECURITY, ARES 2023, 2023,
  • [4] METHODOLOGIES OF RISK ASSESSMENT
    NEWILL, VA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1976, 271 (MAY28) : 413 - 417
  • [5] Standard Compliant Hazard and Threat Analysis for the Automotive Domain
    Beckers, Kristian
    Duerrwang, Juergen
    Holling, Dominik
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2016, 7 (03)
  • [6] Methodologies for High-Level Modelling and Evaluation in the Automotive Domain
    Hoelldampf, S.
    Zaum, D.
    Olbrich, M.
    Barke, E.
    Neumann, I.
    Schmidt, S.
    [J]. 2008 FORUM ON SPECIFICATION, VERIFICATION AND DESIGN LANGUAGES, 2008, : 97 - +
  • [7] On Threat Analysis and Risk Estimation of Automotive Ransomware
    Weiss, Nils
    Schroetter, Markus
    Hackenberg, Rudolf
    [J]. ACM COMPUTER SCIENCE IN CARS SYMPOSIUM (CSCS 2019), 2019,
  • [8] Rule-Based Threat Analysis and Mitigation for the Automotive Domain
    Shaaban, Abdelkader Magdy
    Jaksic, Stefan
    Veledar, Omar
    Mauthner, Thomas
    Arnautovic, Edin
    Schmittner, Christoph
    [J]. COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY (SAFECOMP 2021), 2021, 12853 : 24 - 38
  • [9] Current Methodologies in Risk Assessment
    Rath, F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3807 - 3807
  • [10] Multi-Target Threat Assessment for Automotive Applications
    Eidehall, Andreas
    [J]. 2011 14TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2011, : 433 - 438