Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid containing supplements modulate risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-control human clinical trials

被引:85
|
作者
Abu Mweis, S. [1 ]
Jew, S. [2 ]
Tayyem, R. [3 ]
Agraib, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hashemite Univ, Dept Clin Nutr & Dietet, POB 150459, Zarqa 13115, Jordan
[2] Univ Manitoba, Richardson Ctr Funct Foods & Nutraceut, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Univ Jordan, Fac Agr, Dept Nutr & Food Technol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
blood preesure; cardiovascular; C-recative protein; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; heart rate; inflammation; risk factors; triglyderides; N-3; FATTY-ACIDS; FISH-OIL SUPPLEMENTATION; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; LONG-CHAIN N-3; SOLUBLE ADHESION MOLECULES; HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN; ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; BLOOD LIPID CONCENTRATIONS; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/jhn.12493
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundOver 200 clinical trials have examined the effect of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplements on risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease. However, an updated analysis of the evidence is lacking. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to quantify the effect of supplements containing EPA and DHA on risk factors for cardiovascular disease. MethodsAn analysis was carried on 171 clinical trials with acceptable quality (Jadad score 3) that were identified from a comprehensive electronic search strategy of two databases (Pubmed and Cochrane Library). A random effect model was used to obtain an overall estimate on outcomes of interest. Heterogeneity between trial results was tested for using a standard chi-squared test. ResultsCompared with control, EPA and DHA supplements produced significant reductions of triglycerides of 0.368 mmol L-1 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.427 to -0.309], systolic blood pressure of 2.195 mmHg (95% CI = -3.172 to -1.217), diastolic blood pressure of 1.08 mmHg (95% CI = -1.716 to -0.444), heart rate of 1.37 bpm (95% CI = -2.41 to -0.325) and C-reactive protein of 0.343 mg L-1 (95% CI = -0.454 to -0.232). This analysis indicates an increase in both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean difference = 0.150 mmol L-1; 95% CI = 0.058-0.243) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean difference = 0.039 mmol L-1; 95% CI = 0.024-0.054). The triglyceride-lowering effect was dose-dependent. ConclusionsThe lipid-lowering, hypotensive, anti-arrhythmic and anti-inflammatory actions of EPA and DHA supplements were confirmed in this analysis of randomised placebo-control blinded clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 84
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF PURIFIED EICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID VERSUS MIXED EICOSAPENTAENOIC/DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID ON CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY: META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL ENDPOINT TRIALS
    Sheppard, John Patrick
    Palatnic, Leonard
    Lakshmanan, Suvasini
    Drago, Thomas
    Bhogal, Jaspreet
    Roy, Sion
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    Nelson, John R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 1272 - 1272
  • [2] Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomized clinical trial
    Asztalos, Ivor B.
    Gleason, Joi A.
    Sever, Sakine
    Gedik, Reyhan
    Asztalos, Bela F.
    Horvath, Katalin V.
    Dansinger, Michael L.
    Lamon-Fava, Stefania
    Schaefer, Ernst J.
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2016, 65 (11): : 1636 - 1645
  • [3] Efficacy of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements (Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid) in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Kwak, Sang Mi
    Myung, Seung-Kwon
    Lee, Young Jae
    Seo, Hong Gwan
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 172 (09) : 686 - 694
  • [4] Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid versus α-linolenic acid supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Hengying
    Deng, Guifang
    Zhou, Quan
    Chu, Xinwei
    Su, Mengyang
    Wei, Yuanhuan
    Li, Liping
    Zhang, Zheqing
    FOOD & FUNCTION, 2020, 11 (03) : 1919 - 1932
  • [5] Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Docosahexaenoic Acid, and Olive Oil on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
    Schaefer, Ernst J.
    Asztalos, Ivor B.
    Gleason, Joi A.
    Asztalos, Bela F.
    Horvath, Katalin
    Dansinger, Michael L.
    Gillies, Peter J.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [6] Calcium Supplements and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Myung, Seung-Kwon
    Kim, Hong-Bae
    Lee, Yong-Jae
    Choi, Yoon-Jung
    Oh, Seung-Won
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 17
  • [7] The differential effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on cardiovascular risk factors: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Choi, Gyu Yeong
    Calder, Philip C.
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [8] Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) in Clinical Trials in Depression
    Sublette, M. Elizabeth
    Ellis, Steven P.
    Geant, Amy L.
    Mann, J. John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 72 (12) : 1577 - 1584
  • [9] The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials
    Murtagh, Elaine M.
    Nichols, Linda
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    Holder, Roger
    Nevill, Alan M.
    Murphy, Marie H.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 72 : 34 - 43
  • [10] Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Eicosapentaenoic Acid for Cardiovascular Events Reduction
    Yokoyama, Yujiro
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Morita, Sae
    Takagi, Hisato
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Latib, Azeem
    Heffron, Sean
    Bangalore, Sripal
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144