Combining patient-level and summary-level data for Alzheimer's disease modeling and simulation: a beta regression meta-analysis

被引:63
|
作者
Rogers, James A. [2 ]
Polhamus, Daniel [2 ]
Gillespie, William R. [2 ]
Ito, Kaori [1 ]
Romero, Klaus [3 ]
Qiu, Ruolun [1 ]
Stephenson, Diane [3 ]
Gastonguay, Marc R. [2 ]
Corrigan, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Global Res Grp, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[2] Metrum Res Grp, Tariffville, CT 06081 USA
[3] Crit Path Inst, Tucson, AZ 85718 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; Disease progression; Beta regression; Meta-analysis; Logistic; Longitudinal; Bayesian; CAMD; ADNI; DRUG-DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PROGRESSION; COALITION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s10928-012-9263-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Our objective was to develop a beta regression (BR) model to describe the longitudinal progression of the 11 item Alzheimer's disease (AD) assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) in AD patients in both natural history and randomized clinical trial settings, utilizing both individual patient and summary level literature data. Patient data from the coalition against major diseases database (3,223 patients), the Alzheimer's disease neruroimaging initiative study database (186 patients), and summary data from 73 literature references (representing 17,235 patients) were fit to a BR drug-disease-trial model. Treatment effects for currently available acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors, longitudinal changes in disease severity, dropout rate, placebo effect, and factors influencing these parameters were estimated in the model. Based on predictive checks and external validation, an adequate BR meta-analysis model for ADAS-cog using both summary-level and patient-level data was developed. Baseline ADAS-cog was estimated from baseline MMSE score. Disease progression was dependent on time, ApoE4 status, age, and gender. Study drop out was a function of time, baseline age, and baseline MMSE. The use of the BR constrained simulations to the 0-70 range of the ADAS-cog, even when residuals were incorporated. The model allows for simultaneous fitting of summary and patient level data, allowing for integration of all information available. A further advantage of the BR model is that it constrains values to the range of the original instrument for simulation purposes, in contrast to methodologies that provide appropriate constraints only for conditional expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 498
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining patient-level and summary-level data for Alzheimer’s disease modeling and simulation: a beta regression meta-analysis
    James A. Rogers
    Daniel Polhamus
    William R. Gillespie
    Kaori Ito
    Klaus Romero
    Ruolun Qiu
    Diane Stephenson
    Marc R. Gastonguay
    Brian Corrigan
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2012, 39 : 479 - 498
  • [2] A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis
    Lambert, PC
    Sutton, AJ
    Abrams, KR
    Jones, DR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (01) : 86 - 94
  • [3] Meta-analysis of patient-level clinical trials data
    Sutherland, LR
    Faris, PD
    Youssefi, M
    Hogerman, D
    Martin, CF
    LaFrance, N
    Alberta, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S249 - S249
  • [4] A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
    Hatten, Steven J., Jr.
    Lehrer, Eric J.
    Liao, Jenn
    Sha, Congzhou M.
    Trifiletti, Daniel M.
    Siva, Shankar
    McBride, Sean M.
    Palma, David
    Holder, Sheldon L.
    Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (03)
  • [5] A Patient-level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
    Hatten, Steven
    Lehrer, Eric
    Liao, Jenn
    Sha, Mike
    Trifiletti, Daniel
    Siva, Shankar
    McBride, Sean
    Palma, David
    Holder, Sheldon
    Zaorsky, Nicholas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 44 (10): : S113 - S113
  • [6] Patient-Level vs Group-Level Data to Adjust Meta-analysis on Transfusion and Mortality
    Jolicoeur, E. Marc
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (12) : 1157 - 1157
  • [7] Meta-analysis under imbalance in measurement of confounders in cohort studies using only summary-level data
    Ray, Debashree
    Munoz, Alvaro
    Zhang, Mingyu
    Li, Xiuhong
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    Jacobson, Lisa P.
    Lau, Bryan
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Meta-analysis under imbalance in measurement of confounders in cohort studies using only summary-level data
    Debashree Ray
    Alvaro Muñoz
    Mingyu Zhang
    Xiuhong Li
    Nilanjan Chatterjee
    Lisa P. Jacobson
    Bryan Lau
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [9] Prognostic value of pathogenic variants in Lafora Disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-level data
    Federica Pondrelli
    Raffaella Minardi
    Lorenzo Muccioli
    Corrado Zenesini
    Luca Vignatelli
    Laura Licchetta
    Barbara Mostacci
    Paolo Tinuper
    Craig W. Vander Kooi
    Matthew S. Gentry
    Francesca Bisulli
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 18
  • [10] Prognostic value of pathogenic variants in Lafora disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-level data
    Pondrelli, F.
    Muccioli, L.
    Minardi, R.
    Zenesini, C.
    Vignatelli, L.
    Licchetta, L.
    Mostacci, B.
    Tinuper, P.
    Gentry, M. S.
    Vander Kooi, C. W.
    Bisulli, F.
    EPILEPSIA, 2023, 64 : 123 - 123