Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury

被引:227
|
作者
Cremer, OL [1 ]
van Dijk, GW
van Wensen, E
Brekelmans, GJF
Moons, KGM
Leenen, LPH
Kalkman, CJ
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Div Perioperat Care & Emergency Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Neurol, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
head injuries; closed; extended Glasgow Outcome Scale; intracranial pressure monitoring; cerebral perfusion pressure management; goal-directed treatment; therapy intensity level;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000181300.99078.B5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Intracranial hypertension after severe head injury is associated with case fatality, but there is no sound evidence that monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) and targeted management of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) improve outcome, despite widespread recommendation by experts in the field. The purpose was to determine the effect of ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care on functional outcome and therapy intensity levels after severe head injury. Design: Retrospective cohort study with prospective assessment of outcome. Setting: Two level I trauma centers in The Netherlands from 1996 to 2001. Patients: Three hundred thirty-three patients who had survived and remained comatose for > 24 hrs, from a total of 685 consecutive severely head-injured adults. Interventions: In center A (supportive intensive care), mean arterial pressure was maintained at approximately 90 mm Hg, and therapeutic interventions were based on clinical observations and computed tomography findings. In center B (ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care), management was aimed at maintaining ICP < 20 mm Hg and CPP > 70 mm Hg. Allocation to either trauma center was solely based on the site of the accident. Measurements and Main Results: We measured extended Glasgow Outcome Scale after >= 12 months. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the centers. ICP monitoring was used in zero of 122 (0%) and 142 of 211 (67%) patients in centers A and B, respectively. In-hospital mortality rate was 41 (34%) vs. 69 (33%; p =.87). The odds ratio for a more favorable functional outcome following ICP/CPP-targeted therapy was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.44). This result remained after adjustment for potential confounders. Sedatives, vasopressors, mannitol, and barbiturates were much more frequently used in center B (all p <.01). The median number of days on ventilator support in survivors was 5 (25th-75th percentile, 2-9) in center A vs. 12 (7-19) in center B (p <.001). Conclusions: ICP/CPP-targeted intensive care results in prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased levels of therapy intensity, without evidence for improved outcome in patients who survive beyond 24 hrs following severe head injury.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional Outcome After Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
    Bennett, Tellen D.
    DeWitt, Peter E.
    Greene, Tom H.
    Srivastava, Rajendu
    Riva-Cambrin, Jay
    Nance, Michael L.
    Bratton, Susan L.
    Runyan, Desmond K.
    Dean, J. Michael
    Keenan, Heather T.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2017, 171 (10) : 965 - 971
  • [2] Randomized clinical trial of intracranial pressure monitoring after severe head injury
    Chieregato, Arturo
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (02) : 673 - 674
  • [3] Intensive care management of head injury patients without routine intracranial pressure monitoring
    Santhanam, R.
    Pillai, Shibu V.
    Kolluri, Sastry V. R.
    Rao, U. M.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2007, 55 (04) : 349 - 354
  • [4] Functional Outcome After Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    Welling, Leonardo Christiaan
    Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2018, 172 (04) : 392 - +
  • [5] Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure after head injury
    Czosnyka, M.
    Hutchinson, P. J.
    Balestreri, M.
    Hiler, M.
    Smielewski, P.
    Pickard, J. D.
    BRAIN EDEMA XIII, 2006, 96 : 114 - +
  • [6] Does intracranial pressure monitoring improve outcome after severe traumatic brain injury?
    Fred Rincon
    Stephan A. Mayer
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2006, 6 (6) : 507 - 508
  • [7] NEUROSURGICAL INTENSIVE-CARE IMPROVES OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    WARME, PE
    BERGSTROM, R
    PERSSON, L
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1991, 110 (1-2) : 57 - 64
  • [8] Functional Outcome After Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Reply
    Bennett, Tellen D.
    Greene, Tom H.
    Keenan, Heather T.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2018, 172 (04) : 393 - 393
  • [9] INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE CHANGES AFTER SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    JOHNSTON, IH
    JENNETT, WB
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1972, 35 (01): : 143 - &
  • [10] Intracranial pressure and brain compliance after severe head injury
    Mirzadjanova, Z. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 11 : 162 - 162