Hospital Report Cards for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers: How Good Are the Grades?

被引:38
|
作者
Meddings, Jennifer A.
Reichert, Heidi
Hofer, Tim
McMahon, Laurence F., Jr.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; MEDICARE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Value-based purchasing programs use administrative data to compare hospitals by rates of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) for public reporting and financial penalties. However, validation of these data is lacking. Objective: To assess the validity of the administrative data used to generate HAPU rates by comparing the rates generated from these data with those generated from surveillance data. Design: Retrospective analysis of 2 million all-payer administrative records from 448 California hospitals and quarterly hospitalwide surveillance data from 213 hospitals from the Collaborative Alliance for Nursing Outcomes (as publicly reported on the CalHospital-Compare Web site). Setting: 196 acute care hospitals with at least 6 months of available administrative and surveillance data. Patients: Nonobstetric adults discharged in 2009. Measurements: Hospital-specific HAPU rates were computed as the percentage of discharged adults (from administrative data) or examined adults (from surveillance data) with at least 1 stage II or greater HAPU (HAPU2+). Categorization of hospital performance based on administrative data was compared with the grade assigned when surveillance data were used. Results: When administrative data were used, the mean hospital-specific HAPU2+ rate was 0.15% (95% CI, 0.13% to 0.17%); when surveillance data were used, the rate was 2.0% (CI, 1.8% to 2.2%). Among the 49 hospitals with HAPU2+ rates in the highest (worst) quartile from administrative data, use of the surveillance data set resulted in performance grades of "superior" for 3 of these hospitals, "above average" for 14, "average" for 15, and "below average" for 17. Limitation: Data are from 1 state and 1 year. Conclusion: Hospital performance scores generated from HAPU2+ rates varied considerably according to whether administrative or surveillance data were used, suggesting that administrative data may not be appropriate for comparing hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条