The Effect of Hearing Aids on Sound Localization in Mild Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss

被引:2
|
作者
Zavdy, Ofir [1 ,2 ]
Fostick, Leah [3 ]
Fink, Nir [3 ]
Danin, Shir [3 ]
Levin, Aviya [3 ]
Lipschitz, Noga [1 ,2 ]
Hilly, Ohad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Ariel Univ, Dept Commun Disorders, Ariel, Israel
关键词
Unilateral hearing loss; hearing aids; localization; amplification; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OTITIS-MEDIA; HORIZONTAL LOCALIZATION; BINAURAL HEARING; EFFUSION; CHILDREN; LISTENERS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1889-6578
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background Binaural hearing is of utmost importance for communicating in noisy surroundings and localizing the direction of sound. Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) affects the quality of life in both childhood and adulthood, speech development, and academic achievements. Sound amplification using air-conducting hearing aids (HAs) is a common option for hearing rehabilitation of UHL. The processing time of digital HAs can significantly delay the acoustic stimulation in 3 to 10 milliseconds, which is far longer than the maximal natural interaural time difference (ITD) of 750 microseconds. This can further impair spatial localization in these patients.Purpose We sought to assess whether HA effects on ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) impair localization among subjects with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL).Research Design "Normal "-hearing participants underwent localization testing in different free field settings.Study Sample Ten volunteers with "normal "-hearing thresholds participated.Intervention Repeated assessments were compared between "normal " (binaural) hearing, UCHL induced by insertion of an inactivated HA to the ear canal (conductive HL), and amplification with a HA.Results In UCHL mode, with HA switched-off, localization was significantly impaired compared to "normal " hearing (NH; eta (2 ) = 0.151). Localization error was more pronounced when sound was presented from the front and from the side of the occluded ear. When switched-on, amplification with HAs significantly improved localization for all participants compared to UCHL. Better localization with HAs was seen in high frequencies compared to low frequencies (eta (2 ) = 0.08, 0.03). Even with HAs, localization did not reach that of NH (eta (2 ) = 0.034).Conclusions Mild UCHL caused localization to deteriorate. HAs significantly improved sound localization, albeit the delay caused by the device processing time. Most of the improvements were seen in high-frequency sounds, representing a beneficial effect of amplification on ILD. Our results have potential clinical value in situations of mild CHL, for instance, otitis media with effusion.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of unilateral hearing loss on sound localization
    Abel, Sharon M.
    Lam, Katie
    [J]. APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2008, 69 (09) : 804 - 811
  • [2] Sound localization latency in normal hearing and simulated unilateral hearing loss
    Eklof, Martin
    Asp, Filip
    Berninger, Erik
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 395
  • [3] Improved Binaural Hearing Effects and Sound Source Localization in Listeners with Simulated Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss: Effect of a Bone Conduction Device
    Yu, Chongxian
    Wang, Wenqian
    Jiang, Yuan
    Zhang, Xiaoming
    Liu, Yanyan
    Wang, Ping
    Ni, Xin
    Zhong, Mei
    Liu, Yujie
    Liu, Yehai
    [J]. ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [4] Contribution of spectral pinna cues for sound localization in children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss after hearing rehabilitation
    Vogt, Katharina
    Wasmann, Jan-Willem
    Van Opstal, A. John
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 385
  • [5] Sound Localization in Patients With Congenital Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss With a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant
    Vyskocil, Erich
    Liepins, Rudolfs
    Kaider, Alexandra
    Blineder, Michaela
    Hamzavi, Sasan
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) : 318 - 324
  • [6] Unilateral Hearing Loss: the Benefit of Auditory Localization after Adaptation of Hearing Aids Individual
    Capoani Garcia Mondelli, Maria Fernanda
    de Souza Jacob, Regina Tangerino
    Ribeiro, Juliana Pontalti
    Furlani de Mendonca Felici, Maria da Gloria
    Pires Sanches, Rita de Cassia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 14 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [7] SOUND LOCALIZATION IN CHILDREN WITH A SEVERE UNILATERAL HEARING-LOSS
    NEWTON, VE
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY, 1983, 22 (02): : 189 - 198
  • [8] HEARING-AIDS FOR UNILATERAL HEARING-LOSS
    JOHNSON, EW
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1975, 123 (03): : 219 - 219
  • [9] Hearing in Noise With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Adults With Pseudo-conductive Hearing Loss
    Hilly, Ohad
    Sokolov, Meirav
    Finkel, Reut Beck
    Zavdy, Ofir
    Shemesh, Rafael
    Attias, Joseph
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) : 379 - 385
  • [10] Hearing Aids for Adults with mild to moderate Hearing Loss
    Kiessling, Juergen
    [J]. SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2018, 42 (04): : 164 - 165