Who Is For or Against the Park? Factors Influencing the Public's Perception of a Regional Park: A Slovenian Case Study

被引:0
|
作者
Nastran, Mojca [1 ]
Istenic, Majda Cernic [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biosci, Ljubljana 61000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Rural Sociol, Ljubljana 61000, Slovenia
关键词
attitude; local stakeholders; park people relationship; park in designation; perceptions; protected areas; PROTECTED AREAS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; NATIONAL-PARK; LAND-USE; ATTITUDES; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IDENTITY; TRUST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To effectively organize cooperation with stakeholders in the planning and management of protected areas, it is important to understand their perception of the protected area and the factors influencing that perception. This study identifies the factors and their impact on locals' perceptions of the Kamnisko-Savinjske Alps Regional Park in designation, Slovenia. The results of discriminant analysis show that the local population that supports the park has significantly different views of its potential from the population that opposes it. In addition, the local population that supports the park was personally notified by the founders about the plans, while the opposing population was not. Therefore, the former is more trustful of the founders' procedures and there is more cooperation with all interest groups than with the opposing population. Contrary to our expectations, higher education, place of residence, and gender do not affect the population's support for the park. These results confirm that a consideration of the factors that affect the local population's perception of the protected area contributes to more effective involvement of stakeholders in the process of park creation, which is important for the successful management of protected areas.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microclimate in an urban park and its influencing factors: a case study of Tiantan Park in Beijing, China
    Yilun Li
    Shuxin Fan
    Kun Li
    Yue Zhang
    Li Dong
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2021, 24 : 767 - 778
  • [2] Microclimate in an urban park and its influencing factors: a case study of Tiantan Park in Beijing, China
    Li, Yilun
    Fan, Shuxin
    Li, Kun
    Zhang, Yue
    Dong, Li
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2021, 24 (04) : 767 - 778
  • [3] Study on the Influencing Factors of Theme Park Development: A Case Study of Beijing
    Yang, Cundong
    [J]. 2015 SSR International Conference on Social Sciences and Information (SSR-SSI 2015), Pt 3, 2015, 12 : 219 - 222
  • [4] Inequality in Active Public Park: A Case Study of Benjakitti Park in Bangkok, Thailand
    Chandrasiri, Orana
    Arifwidodo, Sigit
    [J]. URBAN TRANSITIONS CONFERENCE, 2017, 198 : 193 - 199
  • [5] Are social media data and survey data consistent in measuring park visitation, park satisfaction, and their influencing factors? A case study in Shanghai
    Huai, Songyao
    Liu, Song
    Zheng, Tianchen
    Van de Voorde, Tim
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 81
  • [6] The Perception of Visitors towards the Level of Satisfaction on Park (Case Study: Singha Merjosari Park Malang)
    Priadaniswari, R.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF PLANNING IN THE ERA OF UNCERTAINTY, 2017, 70
  • [7] The making of successful public space: A case study of People's Park Square
    Heng C.K.
    Chan V.
    [J]. URBAN DESIGN International, 2000, 5 (1) : 47 - 55
  • [8] Public Private Partnerships and the Public Interest: A Case Study of Ottawa's Lansdowne Park Development
    Krawchenko, Tamara
    Stoney, Christopher
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND SOCIAL ECONOMY RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (02) : 74 - 90
  • [9] Business Park Success Factors in Finland: a Case Study
    Ojala, Pasi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 6 (01): : 241 - 249
  • [10] Biosolids in Western Canada: A Case Study on Public Risk Perception and Factors Influencing Public Attitudes
    Sarah Whitehouse
    Panagiotis Tsigaris
    Joel Wood
    Lauchlan H. Fraser
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2022, 69 : 179 - 195