Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

被引:18
|
作者
Balachandran, Aswini A. [1 ]
Duvalla, Swapna [1 ]
Sultan, Abdul H. [1 ]
Thakar, Ranee [1 ]
机构
[1] Croydon Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 530 London Rd, London CR7 7YE, England
关键词
Episiotomy; Female circumcision; Female cutting; Female genital mutilation; Neonatal outcomes; Obstetric outcomes; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH; CHILDBIRTH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Female genital mutilation (FGM) has been associated with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), perineal trauma, genital fistulae, obstructed labour and stillbirth. The prevalence of FGM has increased in the UK over the last decade. There are currently no studies available that have explored the obstetric impact of FGM in the UK. The aim of our study was to investigate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with FGM when compared with the general population. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of consecutive pregnant women with FGM over a 5-year period between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013. Each woman with FGM was matched for age, ethnicity, parity and gestation with subsequent patients without FGM (control cohort) over the same 5-year period. Outcomes assessed were mode of delivery, duration of labour, estimated blood loss, analgaesia, perineal trauma and foetal outcomes. A total of 242 eligible women (121 FGM, 121 control) were identified for the study. There was a significant increase in the use of episiotomy in the FGM group (p = 0.009) and a significant increase in minor PPH in the control group during caesarean sections (p = 0.0001). There were no differences in all other obstetric and neonatal parameters. In our unit, FGM was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse obstetric and foetal morbidity or mortality.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:339 / 344
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?
    Aswini A Balachandran
    Swapna Duvalla
    Abdul H Sultan
    Ranee Thakar
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2018, 29 : 339 - 344
  • [2] Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric outcomes
    Duvalla, Swapna
    Naidu, Madhu
    Johnson, Adeyemi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (11) : 1701 - 1702
  • [3] Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting and Obstetric Outcomes
    Bonavina, Giulia
    Kaltoud, Randa
    Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
    Candiani, Massimo
    Salvatore, Stefano
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (01): : 87 - 90
  • [4] Female genital mutilation adversely effects obstetric outcomes
    不详
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 2 (04) : 505 - 505
  • [5] Female genital mutilation: Obstetric outcomes in metropolitan Sydney
    Davis, Georgina
    Jellins, Jessica
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (02): : 312 - 316
  • [7] Female genital mutilation and obstetric care
    Young, D
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2004, 31 (02): : 157 - 158
  • [8] Female genital mutilation and obstetric intervention
    Primrose, N.
    Alcayde, D.
    Low-Beer, N.
    Ayida, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 157 - 157
  • [9] Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome
    Eke, N.
    Nkanginieme, K. E. O.
    LANCET, 2006, 367 (9525): : 1799 - 1800
  • [10] Female genital mutilation and obstetric care
    Batstra, L
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 25 (3-4): : 320 - 320