GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

被引:511
|
作者
Dunne, John P. [1 ]
John, Jasmin G. [1 ]
Shevliakova, Elena [2 ]
Stouffer, Ronald J. [1 ]
Krasting, John P. [1 ,3 ]
Malyshev, Sergey L. [2 ]
Milly, P. C. D. [1 ,4 ]
Sentman, Lori T. [1 ]
Adcroft, Alistair J. [5 ]
Cooke, William [3 ]
Dunne, Krista A. [1 ,4 ]
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Hallberg, Robert W. [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew J. [1 ]
Levy, Hiram [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Phillips, Peter J. [1 ]
Zadeh, Niki [3 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] DRC GFDL, High Performance Technol Grp, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Princeton Univ, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC CO2; PHYTOPLANKTON GROWTH; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; DIOXIDE UPTAKE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; CYCLE; PRODUCTIVITY; VARIABILITY; EXCHANGE; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon-climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences in simulation characteristics of these two models are described. Because of differences in oceanic ventilation rates, ESM2M has a stronger biological carbon pump but weaker northward implied atmospheric CO2 transport than ESM2G. The major advantages of ESM2G over ESM2M are improved representation of surface chlorophyll in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans and thermocline nutrients and oxygen in the North Pacific. Improved tree mortality parameters in ESM2G produced more realistic carbon accumulation in vegetation pools. The major advantages of ESM2M over ESM2G are reduced nutrient and oxygen biases in the southern and tropical oceans.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2267
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics
    Dunne, John P.
    John, Jasmin G.
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Hallberg, Robert W.
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Cooke, William
    Dunne, Krista A.
    Harrison, Matthew J.
    Krasting, John P.
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Phillipps, Peter J.
    Sentman, Lori T.
    Samuels, Bonita L.
    Spelman, Michael J.
    Winton, Michael
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zadeh, Niki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (19) : 6646 - 6665
  • [2] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part II: The baseline ocean simulation
    Gnanadesikan, A
    Dixon, KW
    Griffies, SM
    Balaji, V
    Barreiro, M
    Beesley, JA
    Cooke, WF
    Delworth, TL
    Gerdes, R
    Harrison, MJ
    Held, IM
    Hurlin, WJ
    Lee, HC
    Liang, Z
    Nong, G
    Pacanowski, RC
    Rosati, A
    Russell, J
    Samuels, BL
    Song, Q
    Spelman, MJ
    Stouffer, RJ
    Sweeney, CO
    Vecchi, G
    Winton, M
    Wittenberg, AT
    Zeng, F
    Zhang, R
    Dunne, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 675 - 697
  • [3] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics
    Delworth, TL
    Broccoli, AJ
    Rosati, A
    Stouffer, RJ
    Balaji, V
    Beesley, JA
    Cooke, WF
    Dixon, KW
    Dunne, J
    Dunne, KA
    Durachta, JW
    Findell, KL
    Ginoux, P
    Gnanadesikan, A
    Gordon, CT
    Griffies, SM
    Gudgel, R
    Harrison, MJ
    Held, IM
    Hemler, RS
    Horowitz, LW
    Klein, SA
    Knutson, TR
    Kushner, PJ
    Langenhorst, AR
    Lee, HC
    Lin, SJ
    Lu, J
    Malyshev, SL
    Milly, PCD
    Ramaswamy, V
    Russell, J
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Shevliakova, E
    Sirutis, JJ
    Spelman, MJ
    Stern, WF
    Winton, M
    Wittenberg, AT
    Wyman, B
    Zeng, F
    Zhang, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 643 - 674
  • [4] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part IV: Idealized climate response
    Stouffer, RJ
    Broccoli, AJ
    Delworth, TL
    Dixon, KW
    Gudgel, R
    Held, I
    Hemler, R
    Knutson, T
    Lee, HC
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Soden, B
    Spelman, MJ
    Winton, M
    Zeng, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 723 - 740
  • [5] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part III: Tropical pacific climate and ENSO
    Wittenberg, AT
    Rosati, A
    Lau, NC
    Ploshay, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 698 - 722
  • [6] The GFDL Earth System Model Version 4.1 (GFDL-ESM 4.1): Overall Coupled Model Description and Simulation Characteristics
    Dunne, J. P.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Adcroft, A. J.
    Ginoux, P.
    Held, I. M.
    John, J. G.
    Krasting, J. P.
    Malyshev, S.
    Naik, V
    Paulot, F.
    Shevliakova, E.
    Stock, C. A.
    Zadeh, N.
    Balaji, V
    Blanton, C.
    Dunne, K. A.
    Dupuis, C.
    Durachta, J.
    Dussin, R.
    Gauthier, P. P. G.
    Griffies, S. M.
    Guo, H.
    Hallberg, R. W.
    Harrison, M.
    He, J.
    Hurlin, W.
    McHugh, C.
    Menzel, R.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Nikonov, S.
    Paynter, D. J.
    Ploshay, J.
    Radhakrishnan, A.
    Rand, K.
    Reichl, B. G.
    Robinson, T.
    Schwarzkopf, D. M.
    Sentman, L. T.
    Underwood, S.
    Vahlenkamp, H.
    Winton, M.
    Wittenberg, A. T.
    Wyman, B.
    Zeng, Y.
    Zhao, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [7] Emergent constraints on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models
    Wenzel, Sabrina
    Cox, Peter M.
    Eyring, Veronika
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 119 (05) : 794 - 807
  • [8] The Land Component LM4.1 of the GFDL Earth System Model ESM4.1: Model Description and Characteristics of Land Surface Climate and Carbon Cycling in the Historical Simulation
    Shevliakova, E.
    Malyshev, S.
    Martinez-Cano, I.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Pacala, S. W.
    Ginoux, P.
    Dunne, K. A.
    Dunne, J. P.
    Dupuis, C.
    Findell, K. L.
    Ghannam, K.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Knutson, T. R.
    Krasting, J. P.
    Naik, V.
    Phillipps, P.
    Zadeh, N.
    Yu, Yan
    Zeng, F.
    Zeng, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [9] Impacts of CO2 concentration and climate change on the terrestrial carbon flux using six global climate-carbon coupled models
    Peng, Jing
    Dan, Li
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 304 : 69 - 83
  • [10] The carbon cycle in the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS-ESM1) - Part 2: Historical simulations
    Ziehn, Tilo
    Lenton, Andrew
    Law, Rachel M.
    Matear, Richard J.
    Chamberlain, Matthew A.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (07) : 2591 - 2614