共 50 条
Pemetrexed in second line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer - The Portuguese experience
被引:2
|作者:
Araujo, A.
[5
,6
]
Barata, F.
[1
,2
]
Parente, B.
[3
,4
]
Rego, S.
[5
,6
]
Teixeira, E.
Melo, M.
[7
,8
]
Queiroga, H.
[9
,10
]
Cunha, J.
[11
,12
]
Duarte, J.
[13
,14
]
Coelho, A.
[15
,16
]
机构:
[1] Ctr Hosp Coimbra, Serv Pneumol, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Coimbra, Pulm Unit, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Gaia, Serv Pneumol, VN Gaia, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Gaia, Pulm Unit, VN Gaia, Portugal
[5] Ctr Porto, Inst Portugues Oncol, Med Oncol Serv, Oporto, Portugal
[6] Ctr Porto, Inst Portugues Oncol, Med Oncol Unit, Oporto, Portugal
[7] Hosp Pulido Valente, Serv Pneumol, Lisbon, Portugal
[8] Hosp Pulido Valente, Pulmonol Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
[9] Hosp Sao Joao, Pulmonol Unit, Oporto, Portugal
[10] Hosp Sao Joao, Serv Pneumol, Oporto, Portugal
[11] Hosp S Marcos, Serv Pneumol, Braga, Portugal
[12] Hosp S Marcos, Pulmonol Unit, Braga, Portugal
[13] Hosp Garcia Orta, Pulmonol Unit, Almada, Portugal
[14] Hosp Garcia Orta, Serv Pneumol, Almada, Portugal
[15] Ctr Porto, Inst Portugues Oncol, Unidade Oncol Mol, Oporto, Portugal
[16] Ctr Porto, Inst Portugues Oncol, Mol Oncol Unit, Oporto, Portugal
关键词:
non-small cell lung cancer;
pemetrexed;
second-line chemotherapy;
D O I:
10.1016/S0873-2159(15)30310-X
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Until 2004, docetaxel in monotherapy was the standard for second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pemetrexed (P) has shown similar activity in this setting with a better adverse event profile. In Portugal, it was introduced in October of 2004. We have carried out a retrospective analysis of patients (pts) who received P for second-line NSCLC in Portugal from October 2004 to December 2006. Data were collected from the records of pts with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and failed first-line chemotherapy enrolled in centers participating in the Portuguese Lung Cancer Study Group (GECP). Objective response (OR; complete [CR] or partial [PR] response) was evaluated using RECIST and safety was assessed using serious or non-serious adverse events (SAEs/AEs). By December 2006, 19 GECP centers had enrolled 244 pts who had received P for >= 1 cycle, and were considered evaluable for both objective response and safety. Demography: male/female, 175/69; median age, 57.0 years (range 20-81); smoking status, y/ex/n, 116/57/71; adenocarcinoma / squamous-cell carcinoma/other histology, 141/72/31; mean time to progression (TTP) 8.07 months. Disease control in 209 evaluable pts was observed in 116 (55.5%): 2 CR, 45 PR and 69 SD; mean TTP 4.70 months. The majority of AEs were grade 3 anemia (15 pts) and neutropenia (18 pts). The mean overall survival was 17.27 months. Our retrospective analysis has observed a similar disease control rate with P in 2nd line (55.5%), and TTP (4.7 months) in our current unselected population to that published in the literature. P is an option for second-line NSCLC with a good tolerability.
引用
收藏
页码:S9 / S20
页数:12
相关论文