Matters of Consequence: An Empirical Investigation of the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV and Implications for Addressing the Atkins Intelligence Criterion

被引:12
|
作者
Taub, Gordon E. [1 ]
Benson, Nicholas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Psychol Program, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ S Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069 USA
关键词
Atkins; intelligence; intelligence quotient; expert testimony; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; FLYNN; EDITION; SCALE; TESTS; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/15228932.2013.746913
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
"Which test provides the better measurement of intelligence, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV)?" is an important question to professional psychologists; however, it has become a critical issue in Atkins cases wherein courts are often presented with divergent Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) scores on the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV. In these instances, courts are required to render a decision stating which test provided the better measure of an inmate's intellectual functioning. This study employed structural equation modeling to empirically determine which instrument; the WAIS-III or the WAIS-IV, provides the better measure of intelligence via the FSIQ score. Consistent with the publisher's representation of intellectual functioning, the results from this study indicate the WAIS-IV provides superior measurement, scoring, and structural models to measure FSIQ when compared to the WAIS-III.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 48
页数:22
相关论文
共 11 条