Brookite vs. rutile vs. anatase: What's behind their various photocatalytic activities?

被引:0
|
作者
Zerjav, Gregor [1 ]
Zizek, Krunoslav [2 ]
Zavasnik, Janez [3 ]
Pintar, Albin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Chem, Dept Inorgan Chem & Technol, Lab Environm Sci & Engn, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Chem Engn & Technol, Marulicev Trg 20, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Jozef Stefan Inst, Ctr Electron Microscopy & Microanal, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
关键词
Titanium dioxide; TiO2; polymorphs; Heterogeneous photocatalysis; Synergistic effect; Water treatment; Reactive oxygen species; Bisphenol A; WET AIR OXIDATION; TITANIUM-DIOXIDE; TIO2; PARTICLES; BISPHENOL-A; PHASE; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; NANOCRYSTALS; DEGRADATION; REACTOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2022.107722
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The results of investigating the morphological, optical and electronic properties of three synthesized TiO2 polymorphs (anatase (A and A2), brookite (B and B2) and rutile (R)) show that the origin of their different catalytic efficiency in the heterogeneous photocatalytic process lies in the depths of the charge carrier traps. The presence of shallow electron traps in brookite extends the number and "lifetime " of generated holes, so brookite is a good choice as a photocatalyst in such heterogeneous photocatalytic systems where these two variables are the reaction limiting factors. Low generation and high recombination rate of charge carriers in rutile are the consequence of too deep electron traps, therefore the generated electrons are not able to participate in reactive oxygen species generation reactions on the catalyst surface. The longer "lifetime " of charge carriers generated in anatase is due to the fact that anatase belongs to the indirect band gap semiconductors. It was further revealed that the increase of the anatase crystallite size (from 10 to 20 nm) can compensate the negative effect of decreasing specific surface area (from 129.5 to 65.0 m(2)/g) on the photocatalytic activity of anatase. The negative effect of decreasing specific surface area was very well expressed in the case of brookite, where the photocatalytic activity dropped with decreasing specific surface area (from 17.2 to 3.0 m(2)/g) while keeping constant brookite crystallite size (asymptotic to 80 nm). Heterogeneous photocatalytic experiments with the model pollutant bisphenol A show that the deposition of bisphenol A degradation products on the catalyst surface can have a detrimental effect on photocatalytic activity of low specific surface area TiO2 polymorphs. The specifics (electronic properties, geometry of particles and photocatalytic activity of each TiO2 polymorph) of the investigated heterogeneous photocatalytic system for reactive oxygen species generation are the reason that the "synergistic effect " between the anatase and rutile phase when used as a physical mixture, regardless of the ratio between them, was not expressed. The anatase phase was shadowed by small and abundant rutile nanoparticles with low photocatalytic activity, which acted also as a harvester of UV-light due to a wider UV-light absorption range. We can conclude that the less studied TiO2 polymorph brookite is worthy of investigation, as the results of the present study show that the photocatalytic activity of brookite with the adequate specific surface area is comparable to the photo catalytic activity of the widely investigated anatase TiO2. In addition, it can be concluded that in the physical mixtures of different TiO2 polymorphs, the use of TiO2 particles of close diameters is of crucial importance to achieve a "synergistic " photocatalytic effect triggered by particle collisions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatase vs. rutile efficiency on the photocatalytic degradation of clofibric acid under near UV to visible irradiation
    Silva, Claudia Gomes
    Faria, Joaquim Luis
    [J]. PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 8 (05) : 705 - 711
  • [2] Anatase vs. rutile efficiency on the photocatalytic degradation of clofibric acid under near UV to visible irradiation
    Cláudia Gomes Silva
    Joaquim Luís Faria
    [J]. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 2009, 8 : 705 - 711
  • [3] What's in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others
    Adriaans, Jule
    Liebig, Stefan
    Sabbagh, Clara
    Jasso, Guillermina
    [J]. SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2021, 34 (04) : 397 - 427
  • [4] What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others
    Jule Adriaans
    Stefan Liebig
    Clara Sabbagh
    Guillermina Jasso
    [J]. Social Justice Research, 2021, 34 : 397 - 427
  • [5] What's the difference? - Gorman vs. Stripling
    Berry, JN
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2004, 129 (05) : 30 - 32
  • [6] Conform vs. comply: What's the difference?
    不详
    [J]. POLLUTION ENGINEERING, 1999, 31 (09) : 37 - 38
  • [7] BURMA VS. MYANMAR What's in a Name?
    Dittmer, Lowell
    [J]. ASIAN SURVEY, 2008, 48 (06) : 885 - 888
  • [8] What they said vs. what they meant
    Schwartz, SE
    [J]. LUBRICATION ENGINEERING, 1998, 54 (01): : 64 - 64
  • [9] Insights into Different Photocatalytic Oxidation Activities of Anatase, Brookite, and Rutile Single-Crystal Facets
    Guennemann, Carsten
    Haisch, Christoph
    Fleisch, Manuel
    Schneider, Jenny
    Emeline, Alexei V.
    Bahnemann, Detlef W.
    [J]. ACS CATALYSIS, 2019, 9 (02) : 1001 - 1012
  • [10] Prevention vs. treatment: what's the right balance?
    Hackett, Martine
    [J]. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 23 (04) : 503 - 504