Trophic relations of brown and black bears in several western North American ecosystems

被引:147
|
作者
Jacoby, ME [1 ]
Hilderbrand, GV
Servheen, C
Schwartz, CC
Arthur, SM
Hanley, TA
Robbins, CT
Michener, R
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Zool, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Univ Montana, US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] Alaska Dept Fish & Game, Sokdotna, AK 99669 USA
[4] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Juneau, AK 99801 USA
[5] Washington State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[6] Boston Univ, Dept Biol, Stable Isotope Lab, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1999年 / 63卷 / 03期
关键词
black bear; brown bear; diet; Glacier National Park; grizzly lear; Kenai Peninsula; meat; stable isotopes; trophic level; Ursus americanus; Ursus arctos; Yellowstone National Park;
D O I
10.2307/3802806
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We examined the historical and current diets of brown bears (Ursus arctos) and black bears (U. americanus) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Glacier National Park and immediately adjacent areas of national forests, Cabinet-Yaak mountains of northwestern Montana and northern Idaho, Blackfeet and Flathead Indian reservations east and south of Glacier National Park, the Kenai Peninsula of Alaska, and the southwestern states of Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. Dietary estimates are an essential first step in understanding variation in productivity and density of current populations and, therefore, predicting success of reintroduced populations. Hair or bone samples from 14 federal or state agencies, museums, and universities were examined via stable isotope analyses to quantify the importance of animal and plant resources to sympatric brown and black bears. Stable isotope analyses have numerous advantages over fecal analyses or direct observation because diets of (1) individuals and thereby specific age and sex classes within a population can be compared, and (2) long-dead bears can be compared to living bears to evaluate historical changes in ecosystems. Meat content of current brown bear diets, which varied extensively between individuals and age and sex classes in all populations, averaged 51 +/- 19% ((x) over bar +/- SD) for subadult and adult males and females in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and 11 +/- 14% in Glacier National Park and Cabinet-Yaak mountains. Within these ecosystems, adult male brown bears were more carnivorous than any other age or sex class. Brown bears that used easily obtained, abundant meat sources had dietary meat contents generally greater than or equal to 70%. The meat:plant ratios in the diets of historical Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem bears (1,000 YBP) and Glacier National Park bears (1908-18) were similar to ratios in current diets. Sympatric black bears in the Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho ecosystems had dietary meat:plant ratios that were not different from all brown bear age and sex classes, except adult males. Alaskan black bears made extensive use of salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) when brown bears were rare (53 +/- 28% of the diet), but did not use salmon when sympatric with abundant brown bears.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 929
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The role of American black bears and brown bears as predators on ungulates in North America
    Zager, Peter
    Beecham, John
    [J]. URSUS, 2006, 17 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [2] Body size plasticity in North American black and brown bears
    Cameron, Matthew D.
    Hilderbrand, Grant, V
    Joly, Kyle
    Schmidt, Joshua H.
    Gustine, David D.
    Mangipane, Lindsey S.
    Mangipane, Buck
    Sorum, Mathew S.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (08):
  • [3] Ecological plasticity of denning chronology by American black bears and brown bears
    Fowler, Nicholas L.
    Belant, Jerrold L.
    Wang, Guiming
    Leopold, Bruce D.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 20
  • [4] A comparison of genetic diversity in North American brown bears
    Waits, L
    Paetkau, D
    Strobeck, C
    Ward, RH
    [J]. URSUS, VOL 10 - 1998, 1998, 10 : 307 - 314
  • [5] LEPTOSPIROSIS IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN AMERICAN BLACK BEARS (URSUS AMERICANUS) IN WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, USA
    Sasmal, Indrani
    Gould, Nicholas P.
    Schuler, Krysten L.
    Chang, Yung-Fu
    Thachil, Anil
    Strules, Jennifer
    Olfenbuttel, Colleen
    Datta, Shubham
    DePerno, Christopher S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2019, 55 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [6] Geographic distribution of American black bears in North America
    Scheick, Brian K.
    McCown, Walter
    [J]. URSUS, 2014, 25 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [7] Variation in genetic diversity across the range of North American brown bears
    Paetkau, D
    Waits, LP
    Clarkson, PL
    Craighead, L
    Vyse, E
    Ward, R
    Strobeck, C
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) : 418 - 429
  • [8] Rising synchrony controls western North American ecosystems
    Black, Bryan A.
    van der Sleen, Peter
    Di Lorenzo, Emanuele
    Griffin, Daniel
    Sydeman, William J.
    Dunham, Jason B.
    Rykaczewski, Ryan R.
    Garcia-Reyes, Marisol
    Safeeq, Mohammad
    Arismendi, Ivan
    Bograd, Steven J.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (06) : 2305 - 2314
  • [9] Denning ecology of American black bears in the Cascade Mountains of western Oregon
    Immell, Dave
    Jackson, DeWaine H.
    Boulay, Margaret C.
    [J]. URSUS, 2013, 24 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [10] Identifying habitat linkages for American black bears in North Carolina, USA
    Kindall, Jason L.
    Van Manen, Frank T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (02): : 487 - 495