Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without extraction of the third molar in patients with mandibular prognathism

被引:3
|
作者
Moroi, Akinori [1 ]
Yoshizawa, Kunio [1 ]
Iguchi, Ran [1 ]
Hiroumi, Ikawa [1 ]
Kosaka, Akihiko [1 ]
Hotta, Asami [1 ]
Tsutsui, Takamitsu [1 ]
Saita, Yuriko [1 ]
Ueki, Koichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Med & Engn, Div Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg,Chuo Ku, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
关键词
Extraction of third molar; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Skeletal stability; PLATE FIXATION; DENTAL CHANGES; BAD SPLIT; REMOVAL; RELAPSE; SEPARATORS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through cephalometric analysis, the skeletal stability following BSSRO performed with and without extraction of the third molar, and to examine the healing of the extraction sockets through computed tomography (CT). Patients and methods: Sixty Japanese patients (male: 14, female: 46) diagnosed with mandibular prognathism were included in this study. While 30 patients underwent BSSRO along with extraction of the third molar (extraction group), the other 30 patients underwent BSSRO alone (non-extraction group). Skeletal stability was assessed using axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms. CT scans were obtained 1 week after surgery and at the 1-year follow-up for all the patients. CT value was measured at the point of the extraction socket on the horizontal plane parallel to the Frankfurt plane using computer software (SimPlant 2011; Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium). The region of interest (ROI) was approximately 4 mm(2) and the mean value was recorded. Healing of the extraction sockets was examined through CT 1 year postoperatively. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the parameters at any observation interval. In the extraction group, there were significant differences between the values of CT obtained 1 week postoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in the extraction socket (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that there is no significant difference in the skeletal stability between BSSRO performed with and without third molar extraction. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1108
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry
    Ohba, Seigo
    Nakao, Noriko
    Kawasaki, Takako
    Miura, Kei-ichiro
    Minamizato, Tokutaro
    Koga, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Noriaki
    Asahina, Izumi
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (08): : 920 - 926
  • [2] Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry
    Ueki, Koichiro
    Moroi, Akinori
    Sotobori, Megumi
    Ishihara, Yuri
    Marukawa, Kohei
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Kato, Koroku
    Kawashiri, Shuichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 40 (08) : 821 - 827
  • [3] Skeletal stability after simultaneous mandibular angle resection and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandible prognathism
    Kim, Chul-Hwan
    Lee, Ju-Hyun
    Cho, Ju-Yeon
    Lee, Jae-Hoon
    Kim, Kyung-Wook
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (02) : 192 - 197
  • [4] The sagittal split ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism
    Wolford, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (03) : 310 - 312
  • [5] Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite
    Yoshioka, Izumi
    Tanaka, Tatsurou
    Habu, Manabu
    Oda, Masafumi
    Kodama, Masaaki
    Kokuryo, Shinya
    Kito, Shinji
    Wakasugi-Sato, Nao
    Matsumoto-Takeda, Shinobu
    Seta, Yuji
    Fukudome, Yuki
    Tominaga, Kazuhiro
    Sakoda, Sumio
    Morimoto, Yasuhiro
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 115 (04): : 455 - 465
  • [6] Does the Pharyngeal Airway Recover After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Prognathism?
    Jeon, Jae-Yun
    Kim, Tae-Sun
    Kim, Sang Yoon
    Park, Chang-Joo
    Hwang, Kyung-Gyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (01) : 162 - 169
  • [7] Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism
    Lin, Han
    He, Yifan
    Feng, Yifan
    Huang, Fang
    [J]. HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2019, 15 (1)
  • [8] Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism
    Han Lin
    Yifan He
    Yifan Feng
    Fang Huang
    [J]. Head & Face Medicine, 15
  • [9] Tongue-palatal contact changes in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an electropalatography study
    Kojima, S.
    Kaku, M.
    Yamamoto, I.
    Yasuhara, Y.
    Sumi, H.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Yashima, Y.
    Izumino, J.
    Nakajima, K.
    Nagano, Y.
    Kono, M.
    Yoshimura, A.
    Ueasa, M.
    Tanimoto, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (09) : 673 - 682
  • [10] Comparison of the computed tomography values of the bone fragment gap after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry
    Moroi, A.
    Yoshizawa, K.
    Iguchi, R.
    Kosaka, A.
    Ikawa, H.
    Saida, Y.
    Hotta, A.
    Tsutsui, T.
    Ueki, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (12) : 1520 - 1525