Top guns may not fire: Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes

被引:47
|
作者
Chowdhury, Subhasish M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dongryul [4 ]
Sheremeta, Roman M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Econ, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Ctr Behav & Expt Social Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ E Anglia, ESRC Ctr Competit Policy, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[4] Sungshin Univ, Dept Econ, Seoul 136742, South Korea
[5] Chapman Univ, Argyros Sch Business & Econ, Orange, CA 92866 USA
关键词
Best-shot technology; Group contest; Group-specific public goods; Free-riding; WEAKEST-LINK CONTESTS; RENT-SEEKING; GAME; EQUILIBRIA; PROVISION; CONFLICT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze a group contest in which n groups compete to win a group-specific public good prize. Group sizes can be different and any player may value the prize differently within and across groups. Players exert costly efforts simultaneously and independently. Only the highest effort (the best-shot) within each group represents the group effort that determines the winning group. We fully characterize the set of equilibria and show that in any equilibrium at most one player in each group exerts strictly positive effort. There always exists an equilibrium in which only the highest value player in each active group exerts strictly positive effort. However, perverse equilibria may exist in which the highest value players completely free-ride on others by exerting no effort. We provide conditions under which the set of equilibria can be restricted and discuss contest design implications. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条