THE SPONSORS OF SEX OFFENDER BILLS SPEAK UP Policy Makers' Perceptions of Sex Offenders, Sex Crimes, and Sex Offender Legislation

被引:32
|
作者
Meloy, Michelle [1 ]
Curtis, Kristin [2 ]
Boatwright, Jessica [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sociol Anthropol & Criminal Justice Dept, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Walter Rand Inst Publ Policy, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Dept Sociol & Criminal Justice, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
policy makers; sex offender legislation; public safety; victims; community notification; residence restrictions; METAANALYSIS; DESISTANCE; IMPACT; RESTRICTIONS; REGISTRATION; RECIDIVISM; SENSE;
D O I
10.1177/0093854812455740
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the first investigation of its kind, a national U.S. sample of state-level policy makers (N = 61) were interviewed about their perceptions of the sexual offenders in their state, their state's sex offender laws, and collateral consequences of these laws, among other efficacy questions. Respondents were selected nonrandomly, as policy makers who sponsored sex offender bills were deliberately targeted for inclusion in the study. It was presumed these respondents would be more knowledgeable about sex offenders and sex offender laws. Results indicated that most respondents were familiar with the sex offender legislation in their state, that most of the laws were drafted with hopes of increasing public safety, and that policy makers believed their laws were functioning as intended, although empirical data are lacking to support these latter claims. Despite a strong conviction that sex offender laws are necessary to control sexual recidivism, policy makers discussed numerous complications and potentially deleterious effects of their own laws.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 452
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Victims' Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders and Sex Offender Legislation
    Spoo, Susanne
    Kaylor, Leah E.
    Schaaf, Sarah
    Rosselli, Michelle
    Laake, Anniken
    Johnson, Christina
    Jeglic, Elizabeth L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 62 (11) : 3385 - 3407
  • [2] A comparative analysis of Australian sex offender legislation for sex offender registries
    Vess, James
    Langskaill, Brooke
    Day, Andrew
    Powell, Martine
    Graffam, Joe
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2011, 44 (03): : 404 - 424
  • [3] Sex offender treatment and legislation
    Berlin, FS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2003, 31 (04): : 510 - 513
  • [4] Treating sex offenders: An introduction to sex offender treatment programmes
    Seaward, J
    [J]. LEGAL AND CRIMINOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 11 : 148 - 149
  • [5] Treating Sex Offenders: An Introduction to Sex Offender Treatment Programmes
    Peterson, Elicka S. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW, 2008, 18 (02) : 250 - 252
  • [6] Treating sex offenders: An introduction to sex offender treatment programmes
    Smith, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2006, 36 (01): : 166 - 167
  • [7] Sex Offender Stigma: An Exploration of Vigilantism against Sex Offenders
    Cubellis, Michelle A.
    Evans, Douglas N.
    Fera, Adam G.
    [J]. DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, 2019, 40 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [8] Policy-makers' perceptions on their sex offender laws: the good, the bad, and the ugly
    Meloy, Michelle
    Curtis, Kristin
    Boatwright, Jessica
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES, 2013, 26 (03) : 273 - 288
  • [10] 'SEX OFFENDER'
    HAMILTON, F
    [J]. DEKALB LITERARY ARTS JOURNAL, 1984, 17 (3-4): : 76 - 76