Effects of nerve growth factor on nerve regeneration through a vein graft across a gap

被引:65
|
作者
Pu, LLQ
Syed, SA
Reid, M
Patwa, H
Goldstein, JM
Forman, DL
Thomson, JG
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Plast Surg, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-199910000-00021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The limited availability of donor sites for nerve grafts and their inherent associated morbidity continue to stimulate research toward finding suitable alternatives. In the following study, the effect of direct administration of nerve growth factor (NGF) into a nerve conduit across a gap was tested in a rat sciatic nerve model. A l-cm segment of the right sciatic nerve in Sprague-Dawley rats was resected, and the gap was then bridged using one of three methods: group I (NGF-treated group, n = 12), a vein graft filled with NGF (100 ng in 0.3-ml phosphate buffered saline); group II (control group, n = 12), a vein graft filled with phosphate buffered saline only; group III (standard nerve graft, n = 11), a resected segment of the sciatic nerve. All animals were evaluated at 3 and 5 weeks by behavioral testing and at 5 weeks by electrophysiologic testing. At 3 weeks, sensory testing showed that the latency to a noxious stimulus in group I animals (8.0 +/- 5.4 sec, mean +/- SD) was significantly lower than that of group II animals (13.2 +/-: 6.5 sec), indicating that sensory recovery was superior in the animals receiving NGF. The mean latency of animals in group III was 12.9 +/- 6.5 sec, but the difference between the latencies of group I and group III did not reach statistical significance. At 5 weeks, there was no difference in sensory testing between groups. Motor function in groups I and III as measured by walk pattern analysis was superior to that of group II at 5 weeks (toe spread ratios 0.66 +/- 0.09, 0.48 +/- 0.07, and 0.69 +/- 0.09 for groups I, II, and III, respectively). Mean motor conduction velocities across the l-cm gap were 8.6 +/- 4.7 m/sec, 2.5 +/- 0.7 m/sec, and 6.9 +/- 2.9 m/sec in groups I, II, and III respectively. The difference between groups I and III was not statistically significant, but the motor conduction velocity of group II was significantly slower than that of either group I or III (p < 0.002). The positive effects of NGF on regeneration of nerves across a gap seen in this study suggest that it may be useful for treating peripheral nerve injuries in combination with autogenous vein grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1385
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of nerve growth factor on nerve regeneration through a vein graft across a gap
    Meek, MF
    Coert, JH
    Robinson, PH
    van der Werff, JFA
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (05) : 1227 - 1228
  • [2] Enhancement of nerve regeneration and orientation across a gap with a nerve graft within a vein conduit graft: A functional, stereological, and electrophysiological study
    Keskin, M
    Akbas, H
    Uysal, OA
    Canan, S
    Ayyildiz, M
    Agar, E
    Kaplan, S
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (05) : 1372 - 1379
  • [3] Effects of nerve growth factor on nerve regeneration after corneal nerve damage
    Ma, Ke
    Yan, Naihong
    Huang, Yongzhi
    Cao, Guiqun
    Deng, Jie
    Deng, Yingping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (11): : 4584 - 4589
  • [4] Nerve growth factor enhances nerve regeneration through fibronectin grafts
    Whitworth, IH
    Brown, RA
    Dore, CJ
    Anand, P
    Green, CJ
    Terenghi, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1996, 21B (04): : 514 - 522
  • [5] Peripheral nerve regeneration through nerve guide conduit with nerve growth factor gradient
    Kang, J. G.
    Kim, T. H.
    Oh, S. H.
    Namgung, Uk
    Song, K. S.
    Lee, J. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 8 : 402 - 402
  • [6] COMPARISON OF REGENERATION RESULTS OF PREFABRICATED NERVE GRAFT, AUTOGENOUS NERVE GRAFT, AND VEIN GRAFT IN REPAIR OF NERVE DEFECTS
    Karagoz, Huseyin
    Ulkur, Ersin
    Uygur, Fatih
    Senol, Mehmet Guney
    Yapar, Mehmet
    Turan, Pinar
    Celikoz, Bahattin
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2009, 29 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [7] AUTOGENOUS VEIN GRAFT AS A CONDUIT FOR NERVE REGENERATION
    CHIU, DTW
    JANECKA, I
    KRIZEK, TJ
    WOLFF, M
    LOVELACE, RE
    [J]. SURGICAL FORUM, 1980, 31 : 550 - 551
  • [8] AUTOGENOUS VEIN GRAFT AS A CONDUIT FOR NERVE REGENERATION
    CHIU, DTW
    JANECKA, I
    KRIZEK, TJ
    WOLFF, M
    LOVELACE, RE
    [J]. SURGERY, 1982, 91 (02) : 226 - 233
  • [9] Effect of nerve regeneration factor on the growth of nerve
    Gu, XS
    Ding, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 52 : S4 - S4
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF NERVE REGENERATION ACROSS A SURAL NERVE GRAFT AND A VASCULARIZED PSEUDOSHEATH
    MACKINNON, SE
    DELLON, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1988, 13A (06): : 935 - 942