共 12 条
- [1] Reply to Jonathan Aning, Paul McCoubrie, and Jon Oxley's Letter to the Editor re: Giorgio Gandaglia, Guillaume Ploussard, Massimo Valerio, et al. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imagingtargeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2020;77:733-41 EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (05) : E200 - E200
- [2] Re: The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (01) : 164 - 165
- [3] Re: Giorgio Gandaglia, Guillaume Ploussard, Massimo Valerio, et al. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy. Eur Urol Oncol 2020;7:739-47 EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (01): : 127 - 128
- [4] The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (06) : 733 - 741
- [5] Re: Frank-Jan H. Drost, Daniel Osses, Daan Nieboer, et al. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2020;77:78-94 Are Targeted Prostate Biopsies Enough in Men with a Previous Negative Biopsy? EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (05) : E138 - E139
- [6] Re: Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Armando Stabile, Joana B. Neves, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2019;76:284-303 Threshold Indication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (05) : E134 - E135
- [7] Re: Guillaume Ploussard, Eric Barret, Gaëlle Fiard, et al. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFUPR1). Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.euo.2024.01.019 EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (06): : 1549 - 1550
- [9] Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor, re: Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Armando Stabile, Joana B. Neves, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2019;76:284-303 The choice of diagnostic test in prostate cancer is a balance of the risks and benefits: One size may not fit all EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (05) : E133 - E134
- [10] Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Nicola Fossati, Andrea Salonia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: Vasilis Stavrinides, Francesco Giganti, Bruce Trock, et al. Five-year Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Large Cohort Study. Eur Urol 2020;78:443-51 EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (04) : E166 - E166