Interobserver Reproducibility of a Grading System for Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

被引:2
|
作者
Perez-Pedrosa, A. [1 ]
Ortiz-Rey, J. A. [1 ]
Lorenzo-Mahia, Y. [2 ]
Iglesias-Rodriguez, B. [2 ]
Peteiro-Cancelo, A. [3 ]
Gonzalez-Carrero, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Complejo Hosp Univ Vigo, Serv Anat Patol, Hosp Xeral Cies, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
[2] Complejo Hosp Univ Vigo, Serv Anat Patol, Hosp Meixoeiro, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
[3] Hosp POVISA, Serv Anat Patol, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2013年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Carcinoma; Renal; Chromophobe; Grading; Fuhrman;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Material and methods: After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cies Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meeting on the Paner et al. grading system criteria was held. After, the participating pathologists applied the system to each case, evaluating one slide selected. Kappa index for interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and it was classified according to the Landis and Koch scale. Results: The grading distribution was similar for most of the 6 participating observers, with grade 1 predominance. The remaining 2 observers considered a relatively higher proportion of grade 2. Kappa index values ranged from 0.136 to 0.674, with a discrete-moderate reproducibility index predominance (0.21-0.60). Highest Kappa value (0.674) was obtained between the most novel and the most expert interobservers. The lowest Kappa value was obtained among the most veteran pathologists (0.136). Conclusions: Interobserver reproducibility for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is discrete-moderate in our institutions when the novel grade proposed by Paner et al. is used. Labeling of grades 1 and 2 is not homogeneous among 6 participating observers. While awaiting a grading consensus on a new classification by the scientific societies, we consider that the routine use of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma should not be used. (C) 2012 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 341
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Chromophobe Tumor Grading System is the Preferred Grading Scheme for Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Finley, David S.
    Shuch, Brian
    Said, Jonathan W.
    Galliano, Gretchen
    Jeffries, Robin A.
    Afifi, Abdelmonem A.
    Castor, Brandon
    Magyar, Clara
    Sadaat, Ardavan
    Kabbinavar, Fairooz F.
    Belldegrun, Arie S.
    Pantuck, Allan J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06): : 2168 - 2174
  • [2] Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the Fuhrman nuclear grading for renal cell carcinoma
    Bektas, Sibel
    Barut, Figen
    Bahadir, Burak
    Gun, Banu Dogan
    Kandemir, Nilufer Onak
    Gul, Aylin Ege
    Keser, Sevinc
    Karadayi, Nimet
    Ozdamar, Sukru Oguz
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2007, 451 (02) : 405 - 405
  • [3] Relating Prognosis in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Chromophobe Tumor Grading System
    Weinzierl, Elizabeth P.
    Thong, Alan E.
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Jeon, Seung Hyun
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (04) : 239 - 244
  • [4] CHROMOPHOBE RENAL CELL CARCINOMA - EVIDENCE FOR A NEW GRADING SYSTEM
    Avulova, Svetlana
    Cheville, John C.
    Lohse, Christine
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Potretzke, Aaron M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E759 - E759
  • [5] Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is Grading Necessary?
    Cheville, J. C.
    Sukov, W. R.
    Lohse, C. M.
    Thompson, H. R.
    Leibovich, B. C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 198A - 198A
  • [6] Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is Grading Necessary?
    Cheville, J. C.
    Sukov, W. R.
    Lohse, C. M.
    Thompson, H. R.
    Leibovich, B. C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 198A - 198A
  • [7] Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
    Delahunt, Brett
    Sika-Paotonu, Dianne
    Bethwaite, Peter B.
    McCredie, Margaret R. E.
    Martignoni, Guido
    Eble, John N.
    Jordan, T. William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 31 (06) : 957 - 960
  • [8] Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
    Yorukoglu, Kutsal
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2007, 6 (04): : 37 - 38
  • [9] Interobserver reproducibility of gleason grading of prostate carcinoma
    Oyama, T
    Allsbrook, W
    Kurokawa, K
    Mikami, Y
    Segawa, A
    Sano, T
    Nakajima, T
    Suzuki, K
    Mangold, K
    Epstein, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 164A - 165A
  • [10] Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ
    Sneige, N
    Lagios, MD
    Schwarting, R
    Colburn, W
    Atkinson, E
    Weber, D
    Sahin, A
    Kemp, B
    Hoque, A
    Risin, S
    Sabichi, A
    Boone, C
    Dhingra, K
    Kelloff, G
    Lippman, S
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1999, 30 (03) : 257 - 262