Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology

被引:36
|
作者
Pauwels, Eleonore [1 ]
机构
[1] Woodrow Wilson Int Ctr Scholars, Synthet Biol Project, Sci & Technol Innovat Program, Washington, DC 20560 USA
关键词
synthetic biology; public perceptions; framing; risk-benefit trade-off; application; BIOTECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective of this article is not to draw exhaustive conclusions about public perceptions of synthetic biology but to provide readers with an integrated review of the findings from 4 years of quantitative and qualitative research conducted On this subject in the United States. US public perceptions toward synthetic biology are ambivalent. Members of the public show enthusiasm for synthetic biology applications when those applications are developed to address societal, medical, and sustainability needs, whereas engineering biology is seen as a potential concern if this research is done without investigations of its potential risks and long-term implications. Members of the public also support funding for research that leads to applications that actually meet social and sustainability goals. When it comes to oversight, their priorities are to promote transparency and accountability and to ensure a form of tailored governance in which diverse knowledge sources help address the uncertainty surrounding new technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding and exploiting feedback in synthetic biology
    Afroz, Taliman
    Beisel, Chase L.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 103 : 79 - 90
  • [2] Public and policy engagement on synthetic biology
    Costa, Kevin
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [3] Synthetic biology: understanding biological design from synthetic circuits
    Mukherji, Shankar
    van Oudenaarden, Alexander
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2009, 10 (12) : 859 - 871
  • [4] Synthetic biology: understanding biological design from synthetic circuits
    Shankar Mukherji
    Alexander van Oudenaarden
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009, 10 : 859 - 871
  • [5] Understanding Biological Regulation Through Synthetic Biology
    Bashor, Caleb J.
    Collins, James J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 47, 2018, 47 : 399 - 423
  • [6] Synthetic Developmental Biology: Understanding Through Reconstitution
    Schlissel, Gavin
    Li, Pulin
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, VOL 36, 2020, 2020, 36 : 339 - 357
  • [7] Editorial overview: Synthetic biology - From understanding to engineering biology and back
    Bange, Gert
    Waldminghaus, Torsten
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 34 : A151 - A153
  • [8] Behavioral Economics and the Public Acceptance of Synthetic Biology
    Oliver, Adam
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 : S50 - S55
  • [9] A Serious Game for Public Engagement in Synthetic Biology
    Schmidt, Markus
    Radchuk, Olga
    Meinhart, Camillo
    [J]. GAMES FOR TRAINING, EDUCATION, HEALTH AND SPORTS, 2014, 8395 : 77 - 85
  • [10] The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology
    Marris, Claire
    [J]. SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2015, 24 (01) : 83 - 98