The optimal treatment of metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer: abiraterone acetate or docetaxel?

被引:6
|
作者
Aoun, Fouad [1 ]
El Rassy, Elie [2 ]
Sleilaty, Ghassan [3 ]
Assi, Tarek [2 ]
Bakouny, Ziad [2 ]
Kattan, Joseph [2 ]
机构
[1] St Joseph Univ, Hotel Dieu France Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] St Joseph Univ, Hotel Dieu France Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] St Joseph Univ, Dept Biostat, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
abiraterone acetate; docetaxel; first line; hormone-naive prostate cancer; network meta-analysis; MITOXANTRONE PLUS PREDNISONE; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; RESISTANCE; ENZALUTAMIDE; METAANALYSIS; AR-V7;
D O I
10.2217/fon-2017-0445
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To determine whether abiraterone acetate or docetaxel should be regarded as the current standard of care for metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHNPC). Methods & materials: A network meta-analysis (NMA) using the frequentist approach and generalized pairwise modeling was computed. Results: The results of this NMA favored abiraterone acetate over docetaxel-based regimens (hazard ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) in patients with mHNPC. The results also suggest a reconsideration of the role of prednisone in view of the absence of a survival benefit (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.59-1.65) with its use. Conclusion: Despite the paucity of direct comparative evidence, the results of this NMA favor the use of abiraterone acetate in the first-line treatment of mHNPC.
引用
收藏
页码:2785 / 2790
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer
    Hamilou, Zineb
    Saad, Fred
    Fizazi, Karim
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 12 (03) : 334 - 338
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of abiraterone versus docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic hormone naive prostate cancer
    Ramamurthy, Chethan
    Handorf, Elizabeth A.
    Correa, Andres F.
    Beck, J. Robert
    Geynisman, Daniel M.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (10) : 688 - 695
  • [3] Indirect comparison of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel for treatment of metastatic "hormone-sensitive" prostate cancer
    Feyerabend, S.
    Saad, F.
    Li, T.
    Ito, T.
    Diels, J.
    Van Sanden, S.
    De Porre, P.
    Roiz, J.
    Abogunrin, S.
    Fizazi, K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [4] Comparison of Abiraterone Acetate and Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk and Metastatic Hormone-naive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Farrell, Ann M.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Karnes, Robert Jeffrey
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (06) : 834 - 844
  • [5] Genomic landscape of metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer
    Mizuno, Kei
    Akamatsu, Shusuke
    Goto, Takayuki
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Ogawa, Osamu
    [J]. CANCER SCIENCE, 2021, 112 : 656 - 656
  • [6] In Hormone-Naive Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Should All Patients Now Receive Docetaxel? No, Not Yet
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2014, 28 (10): : 881 - +
  • [7] Circulating tumor cell in hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer
    Kanayama, M.
    Nagaya, N.
    Nagata, M.
    Horie, S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone acetate (AA) versus docetaxel (D) for the management of metastatic hormone naive prostate cancer (mHNPC)
    Ramamurthy, Chethan
    Correa, Andres F.
    Handorf, Elizabeth A.
    Beck, J. Robert
    Geynisman, Daniel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [9] Medical treatment of patients with hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer: what's new?
    Cathomas, R.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 40 : 192 - 192
  • [10] Metastatic Burden in Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer: A Tale of Two Subgroups
    Haran, A. M.
    Ali, A.
    Clarke, N. W.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (03) : 209 - 212