When group members forgive: Antecedents and consequences Introduction

被引:10
|
作者
Noor, Masi [1 ]
Branscombe, Nyla R. [2 ]
Hewstone, Miles [3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
conflict; intergroup forgiveness; intergroup relations; perpetrator; victim; INTERGROUP FORGIVENESS; COMPETITIVE VICTIMHOOD; NORTHERN-IRELAND; CONFLICT; RECONCILIATION; APOLOGY; PERPETRATOR; EXPERIENCE; PREJUDICE; CONTACT;
D O I
10.1177/1368430215586605
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whether forgiveness is essential for intergroup reconciliation may be disputable, but its potential ability to repair human relationships following offenses committed based on group membership remains of considerable importance. The primary focus of this Special Issue is on the social-contextual factors that encourage forgiveness of past wrongs and the extent to which forgiveness results in meaningful improvement in intergroup relations. The concept of intergroup forgiveness has only appeared on the research agenda of social psychologists over the last decade, so there is still much room for conceptual clarification, empirical validation, and applications to understanding intergroup reconciliation. Significant progress has been made by investigating predictors and correlates of intergroup forgiveness, and the research presented in this Special Issue further illuminates the processes involved in intergroup forgiveness, as well as important consequences. This collection of empirical articles, based on diverse theoretical perspectives and empirical approaches to studying the phenomenon of intergroup forgiveness inside and outside of the laboratory, advance our understanding of when and how improvement emerges across a wide range of real and enduring conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Cehajic, Sabina
    Brown, Rupert
    Castano, Emanuele
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (03) : 351 - 367
  • [2] Study of Antecedents and Consequences of Group Stewardship
    Cao Yonghui
    [J]. CHOL: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND LEADERSHIP SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 131 - 134
  • [3] Antecedents and Consequences of Work Group Engagement
    Sunyoto, Danang
    Tjahjono, Heru Kurnianto
    El Qodri, Zaenal Mustafa
    [J]. VISION 2025: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, 2019, : 8416 - 8422
  • [4] When to Forgive
    Pearson, Geraldine S.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2009, 45 (03) : 159 - 160
  • [5] Motives to (not) forgive deviant group members: A comparison within and between cultures
    Huwae, Sylvia
    Schaafsma, Juliette
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 21 (1-2) : 54 - 64
  • [6] A Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Members' Helping Behaviors in Online Community
    Chu, Kuo-Ming
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT-THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, ICISTM 2009, 2009, 31 : 161 - 172
  • [7] When temporary employees are perceived as threatening: antecedents and consequences
    von Hippel, Courtney
    Kalokerinos, Elise K.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (1-2) : 200 - 216
  • [8] When to forgive.
    不详
    [J]. ADOLESCENCE, 2001, 36 (142) : 404 - 404
  • [9] Antecedents and consequences of the introduction of flexible benefit plans in China
    Lin, Zhaohong
    Kelly, John
    Trenberth, Linda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (05): : 1128 - 1145
  • [10] Comments on "When to Forgive"
    Asaro, M. Regina
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2011, 47 (01) : 3 - 5