Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain

被引:123
|
作者
Amtmann, Dagmar [1 ]
Kim, Jiseon [1 ]
Chung, Hyewon [2 ]
Askew, Robert L. [3 ]
Park, Ryoungsun [4 ]
Cook, Karon F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, POB 354237, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Educ, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Stetson Univ, Dept Psychopharmacol, Deland, FL USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Theoret & Behav Fdn Div, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
minimally important differences; pain interference; back pain; Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; responsiveness; PROMIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; ITEM BANK; ANCHOR; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS; COMBINATION; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; PROMIS(R);
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S93391
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The minimally important difference (MID) refers to the smallest change that is sufficiently meaningful to carry implications for patients' care. MIDs are necessary to guide the interpretation of scores. This study estimated MID for the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI). Methods: Study instruments were administered to 414 people who participated in two studies that included treatment with low back pain (LBP; n=218) or depression (n=196). Participants with LBP received epidural steroid injections and participants with depression received antidepressants, psychotherapy, or both. MIDs were estimated for the changes in LBP. MIDs were included only if a priori criteria were met (ie, sample size >= 10, Spearman correlation >= 0.3 between anchor measures and PROMIS-PI scores, and effect size range =0.2-0.8). The inter-quartile range (IQR) of MID estimates was calculated. Results: The IQR ranged from 3.5 to 5.5 points. The lower bound estimate of the IQR (3.5) was greater than mean of standard error of measurement (SEM) both at time 1 (SEM = 2.3) and at time 2 (SEM = 2.5), indicating that the estimate of MID exceeded measurement error. Conclusion: Based on our results, researchers and clinicians using PROMIS-PI can assume that change of 3.5 to 5.5 points in comparisons of mean PROMIS-PI scores of people with LBP can be considered meaningful.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 255
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS) FATIGUE AND PAIN INTERFERENCE SCORES
    Beaumont, J. L.
    Fries, J. F.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Cella, D.
    Yun, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A165 - A166
  • [2] Minimally Important Differences for Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Promis) Fatigue and Pain Interference Scores
    Beaumont, Jennifer
    Fries, James F.
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Cella, David
    Yun, Huifeng
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 373 - 374
  • [3] Estimation of Minimally Important Differences and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Scores for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Katz, Patricia
    Kannowski, Carol L.
    Sun, Luna
    Michaud, Kaleb
    [J]. ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 2 (06) : 320 - 329
  • [4] Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis
    Lee, Augustine C.
    Driban, Jeffrey B.
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Harvey, William F.
    Rodday, Angie Mae
    Wang, Chenchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 18 (09): : 1096 - 1110
  • [5] Minimally Important Differences for Four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety Among Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis
    Lee, Augustine
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Driban, Jeffrey
    Harvey, William F.
    McAlindon, Timothy E.
    Rodday, Angie Mae
    Wang, Chenchen
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Hawesli, Ammar H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [7] Estimates of Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for Two Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer-Adaptive Tests in Chronic Pain Patients
    Swanholm, Eric
    McDonald, Wade
    Makris, Una
    Noe, Carl
    Gatchel, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2014, 19 (04) : 217 - 232
  • [8] Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Back and Leg Pain in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 (04) : 862 - 870
  • [9] Responsiveness to Change and Minimally Important Differences of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales
    Khanna, Dinesh
    Hays, Ron D.
    Shreiner, Andrew B.
    Melmed, Gil Y.
    Chang, Lin
    Khanna, Puja P.
    Bolus, Roger
    Whitman, Cynthia
    Paz, Sylvia H.
    Hays, Tonya
    Reise, Steven P.
    Spiegel, Brennan
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2017, 62 (05) : 1186 - 1192
  • [10] Responsiveness to Change and Minimally Important Differences of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales
    Dinesh Khanna
    Ron D. Hays
    Andrew B. Shreiner
    Gil Y. Melmed
    Lin Chang
    Puja P. Khanna
    Roger Bolus
    Cynthia Whitman
    Sylvia H. Paz
    Tonya Hays
    Steven P. Reise
    Brennan Spiegel
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2017, 62 : 1186 - 1192